Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmokingJoe

“Again, you can’t effectively take out nuclear silos without using nuclear weapons.”

Yeah, you can. For instance, our GBU-type penetrators and “bunker busters” as well as the AGM-130 and BLU-109 were designed for just such targets. None of those weapons are nuclear.

“Zelensky was effectievly (sic) calling for pre emptive nuclear strikes against Russia. Essentially demanding the world commit suicide because of him.”

Again, no. As I showed above, nuclear weapons are not necessary to take out hardened targets such as silos.

“You showed me nothing.”

Yeah, I did.

“You just tried to gaslight. As usual.”

You can deny the facts; but facts are not gaslighting.


95 posted on 10/19/2022 4:48:58 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: ought-six
Yeah, you can. For instance, our GBU-type penetrators and “bunker busters” as well as the AGM-130 and BLU-109 were designed for just such targets. None of those weapons are nuclear.

So tell us, have any of those have actually taken out Russian nuclear silos before? And how do you suppose Russia would react to anyone attacking their nuclear silos like Zelensky demanded they do?

Again, no. As I showed above, nuclear weapons are not necessary to take out hardened targets such as silos.

Except you haven't actually done anything of the sort.
See above.

103 posted on 10/19/2022 5:33:29 PM PDT by SmokingJoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson