Posted on 10/16/2022 3:37:51 PM PDT by george76
Well they tried to have some R’s but they refused to participate, sort of a self fulfilling prophecy
.
Christie is playing an angle.
If he’s going to run in any capacity, he has to come back to the Center.
Christie checks the polling.
The sun does shine on a dog’s keister every once in a while.
Possibly a good reason for Trump to appear with attorneys in tow. Of course, that depends if this kangaroo court will allow for cross-examination. If not, Mr. President, don’t go.
extremist insurrectionist homophobe islamophobe mysoginist thisist and thatist.I'm guilty on no.s 1, 3, 4, and 7.
The problem isn’t “credibility”
The problem is that Bills of Attainder are forbidden in the Constitution.
This is great. I’ll take any puncture in the leftist narrative no matter whom it comes from. They were expecting Liz Cheney.
Ping
RULE IPelosi rejected McCarthy's picks and substituted her own. Where she violated the "spirit of the rule" was in removing any opponents like Jim Jordan and Jim Banks and replaced him with Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger who were hardly opponents.
The SpeakerCommittee appointment
11. The Speaker shall appoint all select, joint, and conference committees ordered by the House. At any time after an original appointment, the Speaker may remove Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner from, or appoint additional Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner to, a select or conference committee. In appointing Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner to conference committees, the Speaker shall appoint no less than a majority who generally supported the House position as determined by the Speaker, shall name those who are primarily responsible for the legislation, and shall, to the fullest extent feasible, include the principal proponents of the major provisions of the bill or resolution passed or adopted by the House.
Pelosi will argue that she complied with "no less than a majority who generally supported the House position," and that McCarthy's picks were going to be disruptive, despite that being what "minority" members are expected to do.
Republicans like Christie are arguing that Pelosi didn't follow the "spirit" of the rule by appointing "no less than a majority who generally supported the House position," she appointed a 100% majority that supported the House position.
-PJ
A committee made up of 100% ahos. Haters. They are the ones who need to be put in jail. The J6 lynch mob “committee” is made up of the maggots who are committing insurrection. Retarded, greedy Swamp politicians who will attempt to lynch anyone who comes after their corrupt system.
Bingo. This is his attempt at looking tough against Democrats.
That is more defense than Mike Pence ever gave President Trump. He keeps defending his action of rubber stamping the elections as Constitutional, but still allow this kangaroo court to allow and attack President Trump.
The Democrats will be frantic to cheat in next months election.
They cannot afford the tables to be turned on them.
These people are straight up lunatics.
thisist and thatist.
//
That’s great , I like that.
Thisic and thatic too !.
Speaking of credibility.
Looks like somebody is trying to rebuild a little cred for christie
(Did he ever have any to begin with?)
Yes, you’re right. Sadly, Chris has no moral compass.
“There is no other side.”
The essence of liberal debating style.
And Stephanopolous still has one of the most punchable faces on TV, IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.