Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America’s stockpile of nuclear weapons may not work
washingtontimes.com ^ | Robert Monroe

Posted on 10/12/2022 2:56:18 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

Our thousands of nuclear weapons were designed, tested and built in the 1960s, ’70s and ’80s to win the Cold War. None of these weapons has been tested since 1992, over a quarter century ago. Nor has a single new weapon been designed, tested or built during this same period.

The tens of thousands of active nuclear weapons scientists in our three nuclear weapons labs have never designed, tested and built a nuclear weapon.

Nuclear weapons are the most complex systems ever created by man. The detonation of a nuclear weapon is so complex that there are many activities and processes occurring in the initial millionth of a second which we do not understand. The heart of a nuclear weapon is made of plutonium, and many aspects of its aging process are still unknown to us.

During our half-century of active nuclear weapons testing (1945-92), we conducted more than a thousand tests. A great many of these were failures. I doubt that any test was ever conducted in which unexplainable events did not occur. Our best and most experienced weapons designers were noted for telling of many cases where the designs in which they had the most confidence were the ones in which the most complete failures occurred.

All of our nuclear weapons were designed and built when the nuclear weapons age was in its adolescence. Decades of recently-gained knowledge was not included. Also, these weapons were all built under wartime conditions, when speed was essential, shortcuts were taken and there was no time for accurate record-keeping. For example, as designers made last-minute design changes in the weapon under test, these changes may not have been recorded in the weapon’s final “as-built” documentation.

All these weapons were designed to have an estimated 20-year lifetime.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fearmongering; hitthebutton; nuclear; nukes; russiafirsters; testing; washingtonslimes; zottherussiantrolls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last
As a result, all the weapons in today’s stockpile are long past the end of their design life.
1 posted on 10/12/2022 2:56:18 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I think about this often. How do we know our crap even works anymore?


2 posted on 10/12/2022 2:58:57 PM PDT by Codeflier (I am just going to assume you are a Democrat if you call me a Putin supporter and ignore you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Thank you, Bill Klinton!


3 posted on 10/12/2022 2:59:08 PM PDT by quikstrike98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Hey, let’s outsource it to China!


4 posted on 10/12/2022 3:00:15 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

5 posted on 10/12/2022 3:01:39 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA ( Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“None of these weapons has been tested since 1992”

The year Clinton took was elected. Then 8 Bush years then 8 Obongo years. Yes then Trump but how much can one guy do when every day they are trying to destroy you.


6 posted on 10/12/2022 3:02:18 PM PDT by es345st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

What movie is that?


7 posted on 10/12/2022 3:06:10 PM PDT by fretzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I had the same question about Russian nukes. Their military equipment is looking pretty bad these days. What is the likelihood that their nukes don’t work either.


8 posted on 10/12/2022 3:06:39 PM PDT by POWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Two words:

Fogbank.

OK, that’s one word, so sue me...


9 posted on 10/12/2022 3:06:52 PM PDT by null and void (Can't hear the Rod Serling narration? You are not in the audience. You are a part of the story.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Perhaps this article is true, but what other country with Nukes is actually testing them.

North Korea, perhaps I’ve read they are planning a test in the near future.

I have not heard a word about China, Russia, UK, France or any other major country designing, building and testing new nuclear weapons, so it’s just not the USA.


10 posted on 10/12/2022 3:07:11 PM PDT by srmanuel (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

(Sarc) well, the “good news” is that Russia’s won’t work either due to same issues and they have not even invested the trillion dollars on simulation validation. Plus, they were not as elegant designs or as precise in manufacturing to begin with.

Then of course, there is China..


11 posted on 10/12/2022 3:08:18 PM PDT by monkeypants (It's a Republic, if you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I have to take this with a grain of salt.

We have cruise missiles that are nuclear capable. I would
have a hard time believing we don’t have warheads for them.
And that being said, those had to have been created decades
after the weapons they discuss in this article.

Then there’s the nuclear weapons that our subs carry. Those
would likely be younger than the ones they talk about here.

I have a very hard time thinking we don’t have ongoing
programs developing new weapons.

So I think they do touch on an issue that needs review
and being addressed with upgrading. I am not convinced
we are as poorly prepared as this implicates.

Sectors of our weapons, may be. Still...


12 posted on 10/12/2022 3:09:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fretzer

Planet of the Apes. Not sure which one.


13 posted on 10/12/2022 3:10:05 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fretzer

Beneath the Planet of the Apes. Charlton Heston.


14 posted on 10/12/2022 3:10:07 PM PDT by Dogbert41 (Baruch Ha Ba Ba Shem Adonai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fretzer

Beneath the Planet of the Apes (1970)


15 posted on 10/12/2022 3:10:32 PM PDT by POWG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fretzer

One of the Planet of the Apes movies


16 posted on 10/12/2022 3:10:58 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA ( Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“Nuclear weapons are the most complex systems ever created by man.”

This is a misunderstanding. Creating weapons grade uranium and plutonium are the hard parts.

Once you have those getting them to go boom is unfortunately fairly simple.


17 posted on 10/12/2022 3:11:23 PM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

thanks!


18 posted on 10/12/2022 3:11:36 PM PDT by fretzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

Uh oh


19 posted on 10/12/2022 3:12:14 PM PDT by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: POWG

They work.


20 posted on 10/12/2022 3:12:41 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (DJT24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson