Posted on 10/06/2022 6:55:10 AM PDT by Red Badger
Amid mounting questions over an FBI warning that prompted Facebook to suppress a story about Hunter Biden’s laptop, the federal agency now faces a lawsuit seeking to compel it to publicize conversations it had with the social media giant.
The lawsuit was filed Tuesday by America First Legal (AFL) at a Washington D.C. District Court. The non-profit group, founded by longtime Donald Trump adviser Stephen Miller, said Americans deserve to know what the FBI and the social media giant were up to as the November elections approached.
According to the complaint (pdf), the AFL requested in August that the FBI make public all of its communications with Facebook between Oct. 1, 2020, and Nov. 15, 2020. However, the FBI turned down that request, claiming that it was so “overly broad” that it couldn’t be done “with a reasonable amount of effort.”
AFL’s complaint said: “Barely a month before the 2022 midterm election, FBI officials continue to suppress information of great interest to American voters and stonewall AFL’s request for records relating to the FBI’s collusive scheme with Facebook to censor news and information about the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop.”
Zuckerberg’s Podcast Comments
Facebook has drawn much scrutiny after Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, told popular podcast host Joe Rogan that the platform did algorithmically suppress a New York Post story on emails allegedly recovered from a laptop owned by then-presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son. Those emails, according to the Post, showed a direct link Biden had with his son’s dubious business dealings in China and Ukraine.
Zuckerberg said this apparent censorship only happened after the FBI approached Meta with warnings about “Russian disinformation.”
“The background here is that the FBI came to us—some folks on our team—and was like, ‘Hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert. We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election, we have it on notice that basically there’s about to be some kind of dump that’s similar to that,'” he told Rogan in the Aug. 25 interview.
The FBI didn’t specifically mention the laptop story, Zuckerberg said, but Facebook thought it “fit that pattern” the FBI described and decided to limit its reach.
Despite Zuckerberg’s claims, the AFL insists that there was a “comprehensive collusion” between the FBI and Big Tech to censor and control critical information in an effort to put Joe Biden into the White House.
“The evidence is that during the 2020 Presidential election campaign, the FBI conspired and combined with large corporations, including Facebook, to censor and suppress the damning evidence of Biden family corruption and influence peddling found on Hunter Biden’s laptop,” said AFL Senior Counselor Reed Rubinstein. “This was done to help Joe Biden and the Democrats win the 2020 election.”
Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley (Iowa) and Ron Johnson (Wis.) agreed. In their letters to Zuckerberg and FBI Director Chris Wray, the senators asked for names of the government and Facebook employees involved in those conversations about “Russian disinformation.”
“The American people deserve to know whether the FBI used Facebook as part of their alleged plan to discredit information about Hunter Biden,” the senators wrote.
funny of the day
”Overly broad”? Two organizations. A month and a half. Exactly how much does the FBI communicate with Facebook? Or Twitter? Or Google? What the eff is it the FBI’s business to communicate with businesses? Shut the whole thing down. There is no trust in the FBI. It can no longer be effective at anything other than dividing America.
Thank you Stephen!
You never know what will stick, so never give up!
FBI seems to be afraid of the Biden Crime Family, after all, Demented Joe said “Don’t F-— with a Biden”. Joe may turn loose a Clinton Hit Man.
Like Mafiosi, They are all in the same ‘family’...................
Yes, good to see my friend.
Very well worded and thorough
Karl Marx would be proud of these days
FBI = STASI but the STASI never pretended to be anything except the STASI, everyone knew what they were, they were bad.
Requesting 45 days of communications between the FBI and Facebook is “overly broad”. Somehow the FBI can demand years worth of communications between Trump and all of his associates. There should not be very many communications between the FBI and social media platforms. In fact, there should not be any.
Disband them.
Yes, and now anyone with half a brain should know about the FIB.
Why not go on ahead and release the communications? So what if they worked with tech companies to censor Americans?
What are we going to do about it, complain to the DOJ? Write a strongly worded letter? Get a judge to say “Stop doing that” at which point they will promptly ignore the judge?
Stephen or me…….:)
Lol well it was directed at Steven.
But fits for you too!
Heh... 😎🇺🇲😇
Well if you’re a friend of his, you’re definitely a friend of mine!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.