Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Treaty Creates Medical Dictatorship Under Biden
Infowars.com ^ | October 3rd 2022, 5:13 pm | Infowars.com

Posted on 10/03/2022 6:10:39 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Professor Francis Boyle joined The Alex Jones Show on Monday to expose the medical tyranny under Biden being created by a United Nations treaty.

Boyle explained that the World Health Organization (WHO) – the medical arm of the UN – is drafting a treaty that, if signed by Joe Biden, would surrender U.S. health policy to the global body.

“It’s clear that this treaty, if passed, will give the WHO dictatorial powers to determine health policies here in the United States in the event of another pandemic, which of course they know all along they’re going to create,” Boyle said.


(Excerpt) Read more at infowars.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biden; bidenvoters; infowars; tyranny; unitednations

1 posted on 10/03/2022 6:10:39 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is a governing convention, not a treaty.

A treaty is not a proper end around for the Amendment process to let the federal do something it has no lawful power to do or let it delegate powers it never possesed.


2 posted on 10/03/2022 6:14:52 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

the UN – is drafting a treaty that, if signed by Joe Biden, would surrender U.S. health policy to the global body.


Biden’t signing of a treaty might look nice, but it isn’t binding unless it is ratified by 2/3rds of the Senate.


3 posted on 10/03/2022 6:16:18 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A “treaty” can NOT do what the Constitution forbids


4 posted on 10/03/2022 6:21:50 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Treaties must be ratified in the senate. I didn’t think the president can alone sign America to any treaty?


5 posted on 10/03/2022 6:24:52 PM PDT by blackdog ("That's an applause line you useful idiots" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

But then again the president can’t forgive or erase loans either.


6 posted on 10/03/2022 6:26:20 PM PDT by blackdog ("That's an applause line you useful idiots" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Needs ratification by the Senate for Biden to LEGITIMATELY do anything under the auspices of the 'agreement'.

Note the stressing of legitimate. Given what has transpired the last couple of years, that dosen't seem to be an issue.

7 posted on 10/03/2022 6:29:48 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok; hanamizu; blackdog
A “treaty” can NOT do what the Constitution forbids

I wish that was true, but history shows that it isn't.

Biden’t signing of a treaty might look nice, but it isn’t binding unless it is ratified by 2/3rds of the Senate.

That was never true. Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution specifies "two thirds of the senators present," a provision that did not go over well with Patrick Henry at the Virginia Ratifying Convention. See the above link.

I didn’t think the president can alone sign America to any treaty?

ANY officer of Executive Branch of the government may sign a treaty, at which point the government has chosen to abide by and enforce them without ratification, as has been the case for forty years. See the link above. That's why Bush withdrew the signature for the treaty governing the International Criminal Court. See the above link.

8 posted on 10/03/2022 6:45:19 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

So if 7 senators out of ten present in a hotel room vote for a treaty that ratifies it?


9 posted on 10/03/2022 6:52:48 PM PDT by blackdog ("That's an applause line you useful idiots" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I would think any such treaty would need a Senate confirmation. Yea or nay????


10 posted on 10/03/2022 7:00:10 PM PDT by elpadre (W )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
I would think any such treaty would need a Senate confirmation. Yea or nay????

I think Brandon will do anything Obama tells him to do and good luck doing anything about it.

11 posted on 10/03/2022 7:15:01 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ( We need to “build back better” on the bones and ashes of those forcing us to “Build Back Better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

Read the linked article. Treaties have been ratified by voice vote without record of a quorum or even a committee vote.


12 posted on 10/03/2022 7:51:29 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

reasons to bring in foreign troops if we disobey the lockdown


13 posted on 10/04/2022 2:21:19 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bfl


14 posted on 10/04/2022 1:06:17 PM PDT by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson