Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's new crypto bill gets vetoed by governor Newsom [pigs fly: Newsome vetoes a regulation bill!]
kitco ^ | 9/26/2022 | Jordan Finneseth

Posted on 09/26/2022 9:25:12 PM PDT by catnipman

California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed a bill crafted to create a licensing and regulatory framework for cryptocurrency firms in the state,

Under the bill, crypto companies wishing to serve California residents would be required to first receive a license to do so, and it would have also formally adopted new rules governing stablecoins. This includes a requirement that licensed companies only engage with bank-issued stablecoins, which must remain 100% backed by reserves.

(Excerpt) Read more at kitco.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; corrupticrat; corrupticrats; crypto; cryptocurrency; gavinnewsom; newsome; regulation; stablecoins; veto
For some reason, Newsome is quite happy to see his constituents defrauded and ripped off by the plethora of fraudulent schemes, unlicensed dealers and exchanges, and unaudited claims by almost all crypto players ...
1 posted on 09/26/2022 9:25:12 PM PDT by catnipman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: catnipman

He wants to use crypto to raise illegal campaign contributions.


2 posted on 09/26/2022 9:30:55 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (This is the dystopian future we've been waiting for!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
Too bad, I was looking forward to Newsome signing this bill. Most American crypto companies are in San Francisco or the bay area and they all would have simply picked up and left. These companies have low overhead.

3 posted on 09/26/2022 10:00:16 PM PDT by Right_Wing_Madman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

Exactly, Gruesom knew if the bill passed all crypto would ;leave Ca then he would have a harder time hiding demnocrat ill-gotten gains.


4 posted on 09/27/2022 3:38:49 AM PDT by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

Of course he vetoed. His kickback/bribe/campaign contribution was not big enough.


5 posted on 09/27/2022 6:45:35 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson