Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Republicans block bill to require disclosure of ‘dark money’ donors
Washington post ^ | Sept 26,2022 | Amy wang

Posted on 09/23/2022 12:54:45 PM PDT by NoLibZone

Senate Republicans on Thursday blocked legislation that would have required super PACs and other groups to disclose donors who give $10,000 or more during an election cycle, a blow to Democrats’ efforts to reform campaign financing laws.

In a procedural vote Thursday morning, the Senate failed to advance the Disclose Act on a 49-49 vote along party lines. No Republicans voted for it. At least 60 votes would have been required for the Senate to end debate on the bill and advance it.

Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. FEC, which allowed incorporated entities and labor unions to spend unlimited amounts of money to promote or attack candidates. Democrats have railed unsuccessfully against the ruling for more than a decade, saying the ability for corporations and billionaires to advocate for or against candidates anonymously through such groups has given them outsize influence in American politics. Republicans have defended the right of corporations to make political donations, even as some of them have called for greater transparency in campaign financing.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amywang; darkmoney
ACLU agrees with the GOP on this.
1 posted on 09/23/2022 12:54:45 PM PDT by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Good.


2 posted on 09/23/2022 12:55:06 PM PDT by Chgogal (Welcome to Fuhrer Biden's Weaponized Fascist Banana Republic! It's the road to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Sheldon Whitehouse hit hardest


3 posted on 09/23/2022 12:59:42 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

The Dems will have billions from “dark money donors” regardless, so might as well make it a level playing field. Good job for a change, GOP.


4 posted on 09/23/2022 1:04:43 PM PDT by fwdude (Racism is not dead, but it is on life support - kept alive by politicians….” — Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Wait a minute. If the Democrat Party doesn’t know the donors live, it won’t be able to send goons to their houses and intimidate them.

This is a threat to democracy!


5 posted on 09/23/2022 1:05:12 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Only those who can vote for a candidate should be able to contribute to their election campaign.

The wealthy should not be allowed to be involved in politics or government. They’re too out of touch.


6 posted on 09/23/2022 1:07:29 PM PDT by TheDon (Resist the usurpers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

“the ability for corporations and billionaires to advocate for or against candidates anonymously through such groups has given them outsize influence in American politics”

THAT is true.

If you require listing all who gave, the litle guy who kicks in $1,000, will get black listed and hammered by all who oppose, while the Tides Foundation and Emilys’s List Slush Funds hide all their grifters.

Hell, if voting actually mattered,
they wouldn’t let you do it.


7 posted on 09/23/2022 1:08:47 PM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Dark money for Democrats, as in Soros, is fine and would be ignored by the Gestapo.


8 posted on 09/23/2022 1:19:46 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Macoozie
“the ability for corporations and billionaires to advocate for or against candidates anonymously through such groups has given them outsize influence in American politics”

Many multinationals are partially owned by foreign governments in the form of sovereign wealth funds. Saudi Arabia has investments in many companies, Uber for example. Communist China does as well with Lyft. Corporations like those enter into the political arena and are given a pass under our political donation laws.

9 posted on 09/23/2022 1:26:10 PM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Let me guess; its a bill targeting GOP donors and exempts dimocrap donors?


10 posted on 09/23/2022 1:33:11 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Further protects the deep state.


11 posted on 09/23/2022 2:41:59 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

The Republicans can stop *this* bill, but they can’t top anything else.

POLITICIAN....the only four letter word spelled with ten letters.


12 posted on 09/23/2022 5:07:22 PM PDT by Roccus (First we beat the Nazis........Then we defeated the Soviets....... Now, we are them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
I agree that there should be campaign finance reform. If done right, it would actually hurt the democrats more than it could ever hurt our side because they overwhelmingly rely on unaccountable dark money laundered through PACs.

IMO, all donations should be disclosed.

Case in point, in Alabama when Judge Roy Moore was running for office a PAC called "Highway31 PAC" sprouted up to support doug jones by smearing Moore on a daily basis. To this day, nobody knows who their donors are or where the donors are from.

All out of state donations to a candidate should be banned.

Let's take the disgusting, fat, gap-toothed, racist, pig stacy abrams for this example. Does anyone believe that all that money came from Georgia voters? No, it came from hollyweird creeps, and self loathing new yorkers. If the pig only had to rely solely on the donations from those she's wanting to govern, she would have been back chowing down at the nearest all you can eat buffet without so much as a whimper a long time ago.

A PAC that's directly or indirectly supporting a candidate should be based in the candidates home state, not halfway across the country.

I'm talking about the two, yes TWO Autism Texas based (Alabama Christian Conservatives, and AlabamaRINO) PACs that was supporting the deep state whore katie britt in Alabama. These two PACs ran over the top attack ads against both Mo Brooks and Mike Durant, while the open borders whore ran her nauseating little cutie pie ads that were blatant lies (support law enforcement, and securing the border) whitewashing her real positions of being a lobbyist for the states' chamber of commerce demanding cheap labor, and helping the poverty pimpin mayor of Montgomeridishu steven reed draw up a plan to defund and otherwise hamper the Montgomery Police Department.

13 posted on 09/23/2022 7:51:40 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (One Nation, Under Fraud Completely Visible, With Spying and Lying To All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Works both ways. The RATs don’t have to disclose theirs either. The difference is that we might boycott businesses which are RAT donors. The RATs would be likely to burn ours out or attack their people.


14 posted on 09/24/2022 6:34:00 AM PDT by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Militia to the border! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson