Posted on 09/19/2022 7:52:15 PM PDT by TigerClaws
If you’re going to make a documentary film about America’s response to the Holocaust, shouldn’t you at least know how many Jewish refugees were admitted to the United States during those years? Surprisingly, filmmaker Ken Burns appears to be unaware of that basic information—or is for some reason seeking to misrepresent the facts.
Burns has announced that his forthcoming film will challenge the “myth” that President Franklin D. Roosevelt abandoned Europe’s Jews. That remarkable assertion flies in the face of the historical record that numerous scholars have thoroughly documented. Nonetheless, in recent interviews, Burns has claimed that during the Roosevelt years, the United States “accepted more refugees than any other sovereign nation.” That’s simply false.
Start with 1933, the year Adolf Hitler and the Nazis rose to power in Germany. America’s immigration laws would have permitted the entry of 25,957 German immigrants. But the Roosevelt administration suppressed immigration far below what the law allowed. That year, only 1,324 German nationals were admitted to the United States. Smaller numbers came from other European countries—961 Poles, 864 Hungarians, 236 Rumanians (and not all of them were Jewish refugees.)
By contrast, the British government in 1933 admitted over 33,000 European Jews to British-ruled Palestine, plus thousands more to the United Kingdom itself, and small numbers to other British controlled-territories.
In the years to follow, the contrast between the Roosevelt administration and the British government was even more stark. In 1934, the U.S. accepted 3,515 German citizens—less than 14% of that year’s quota—while the British admitted about 50,000 Jewish refugees to the U.K. and British territories (mostly Palestine).
Later in the 1930s, the British began reducing Jewish immigration to Palestine in response to Arab terrorism—but they still took in more European Jewish refugees than the United States did.
And it wasn’t just the British. Consider 1938, when the Roosevelt administration admitted 17,872 German and Austrian refugees. Both the British and the Japanese rulers of Shanghai each took in a similar number that year. France, too, accepted more Jews than the U.S. that year.
During the years 1939-1941, the overall picture changed, but the United States still did not accept “more refugees than any other sovereign nation,” as Ken Burns erroneously claims.
From 1939 to 1941, the Soviets took in an estimated 300,000 Jews fleeing from Nazi-occupied Poland, according to the website of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. That was far more than the number of Jewish refugees the Roosevelt administration admitted during those years.
In 1942, the numbers admitted by the American and British governments were similar. In 1943, however, there was a significant gap between the two. That year, the United States admitted just 1,286 German immigrants. The British, by contrast, admitted 8,507 Jewish refugees to Palestine in 1943, as well as small numbers to other British territories. Those trends continued in 1944 and 1945.
Obviously these immigration numbers do not change the cruel reality of England’s White Paper policy, which blocked most Jewish immigration to Palestine; nor do they change the facts about the Soviet regime’s mistreatment of the Jews in its territory. But the numbers show that Ken Burns is seriously mistaken when he contends that the Roosevelt administration’s record on refugees was better than that of any other country.
None of these immigration statistics are a secret. They all appear in publicly-available Immigration and Naturalization Service charts, which historians have been quoting for decades. If Burns has not seen the charts—or has not read any of the many history books that cite them—that’s cause for concern. If he knows the true figures but is choosing to distort them for partisan purposes, that’s even more troubling.
Sheer numbers aside, there is the problem of the moral relativism inherent in the argument that Burns is making. The Roosevelt administration’s response to the Holocaust should not be minimized or excused just because other countries also did much less than they could have.
Moreover, is it really impressive if the president of a country claiming to represent high ideals of humanitarianism was slightly more generous in admitting refugees than, say, the military juntas ruling in South America? Is that the moral standard by which we as Americans judge our country and our leaders?
In fact, the rulers of the tiny South American country of Bolivia—which is only 424,000 square miles—took in more than 20,000 Jewish refugees during the Nazi years. What does that say about the United States, which is nearly 3.8-million square miles?
Translating Burns’s point into more contemporary terms, is it really a badge of pride that America’s meager response to the Darfur genocide was slightly better than the response of, say, Peru or Lithuania? We have a right to expect better from our country.
We also have a right to expect better from our filmmakers. While a full assessment of Burns’s film must await its release, the inaccurate statements that he has been making about the historical record are cause for concern.
Dr. Medoff is founding director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and author of more than 20 books about Jewish history and the Holocaust. His latest is America and the Holocaust: A Documentary History, published by the Jewish Publication Society & University of Nebraska Press.
Assistant Secretary of State Breckinridge Long, a prominent St Luis, Mo attorney, was in charge of refugee admissions. Long, as his published diary clearly shows literarally hated Jews per se. The very presence of Jews outraged and nauseated him. He was an FDR appointee and retained the President’s confidence throughout the period. He regularly fed FDR the incredible bs that allowing Jews to enter the US would allow ‘hosts of Gestapo agents. to enter the US. FDR was always ‘appalled and horrified’ by this total lie (with tongue firmly in his cheek). FDR was by no means alone in his Jew loathing attitudes, upper class WASP America in the period absolutely hated Jews as noisy, pushy, smelly, obnoxious know it all foreigners. FDR was just reflecting how his class felt, Prescott Bush, at this time, for instance, hated Jews so much he would refuse to be in a room with a known Jew.
“it doesn’t matter how much they wash or how clean their clothing, I can still smell them.’ his is reported to have said.
In this case it looks like he’s making America look better than it was, or at least making a Democrat icon look better than he was.
Was FDR just overly concerned that Germans, Jewish or otherwise, might end up being spies?
He certainly was suspicious of Japanese Americans.
Disagree
Do you have a reputable source for that?
All kinds of crazy, unconfirmed rumors circulate on the Internet.
What about the St. Louis?
FDR hated Japanese for the most floridly racist reasons. He did believe that they were little crosseyed sub humans who could only copy westerners. He hated them as he irrationally hated Germans and wanted them exterminated.
Foote was paid well for collaborating in the Burns propaganda deception. He needed the money badly and he kept his mouth shut about Burns hacks cutting his remarks to say the opposite of what he really said. When you shake hands with the devil count your fingers afterward. Burns is just woke communist whore.
I hope that 100 years from now that FDR, Wilson, etc. will be treated properly and put in the same category as Caligula and Nero.
“Ken Burns is a leftist propagandist and hopefully future generations remember as such.”
FDR, and BURNS, are the most overrated people in their fields in the last 100 years (with the exceptions of the tree great Martyrs and subsequent Saints, St. Trayvon Martin, St. Michel Brown, and St. George Floyd.)
Here is all one needs to know about St. Franklin (I KNOW IT, AND I’M NOT EVEN DOING A DOCUMENTARY ON HIM)!
Said to Henry Morgenthau, Treasury Secretary; “You know this is a Protestant country, and the Catholics and Jews are here under SUFFERANCE. [Its](sic) up to you to go along with anything I want.”
Hated Catholics, too. Nice guy St. Franklin.
Like ALL LEFTISTS BURNS & FDR, are lying, manipulative, hate filled scum.
Big Frank wanted to be the greatest man in world history. He carefully plotted a world in which only two nations would matter, the USSR and the USA. His ‘unconditional surrender’ remark at Casablanca and his ‘gaffe’ at Yalta saying US forces would only remain in Europe of a couple years after the end of hostilities were carefully plotted to guarantee Germany would be destroyed and the Soviet Union would dominated Europe forever. The goal was for Stalin to control Eurasia and the US to control ‘Oceania’, the Western hemisphere and the Pacific Ocean Area. Big Frank wanted to humiliate France by destroying its empire because French boys and girls laughed at his incredibly poor and sel important attempts to speak French when in Paris as a teen ager and he hated Germany because he picked a fight with a junior officr cadet of the Royal Saxon Army in Dresden just before he went to Groton. The cadet was much younger and smaller than Big Frank and he beat the hell out of the cowardly and egotistical Roosevelt. After that he hated Germany. He only denied the Morgenthau Plan because Stimson, to his eternal credit, confronted Big Frank about it.
ken burns is definitely even more troubling
you know ken is lying cuz he is a LEFTIST
FDR hated Jews
by people you mean progressives
um not America a democrat
on the japanese internment
we stopped trading with Brazil cuz we were losing too many ships
Brazil has a large japanese population
La Paz is majority japanese
how many American lives were saved cuz of the japanese internment
American lives as in merchant marines
we werent executing the japanese
and brazil refused to intern their japanese
What is your point? Your post is incoherent. Were you drunk when you posted it. If you are lucid kindly try to post in real sentences.
I plan on skipping this.
And I have read that FDR appointed more Jews to judgeships and cabinet positions than any previous president.
In fact, the real anti-Semites of the day called Roosevelt "Rosenberg" or "Rosenfeld" or some such.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.