Posted on 09/15/2022 9:03:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
There are 435 seats in the House of Representatives (not counting nonvoting seats for D.C. and some U.S. possessions) and all of them are up for election in November. Right now, the Democrats control the House with 219 Democrats versus 211 Republicans (there are five vacancies).
It takes 218 votes to control the House. This means if the Republicans hold the seats they have and pick up just seven seats from Democrats, they will control the House.
Will this happen? The 2022 election cycle is more challenging to predict than usual because it’s the first election since the 2020 Census that the House map had redrawn to reflect population gain or loss on a state-by-state basis.
Texas gained two House seats, while Colorado, Florida, Montana, North Carolina and Oregon gained one each. The losers were California, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia, which lost one seat each.
The new district maps favor Republicans on the whole. Another factor favoring the Republicans is that voters often turn back to the party opposing the incumbent president, either out of dissatisfaction with their presidential choice or simply to balance the scales in ways that keep any one party from becoming too powerful.
The average loss for the president’s party in a first-term midterm since 1982 was 30 seats. If that were the only information I had, my forecast would be that the Republicans would gain 30 seats this November. That would put the House at 241 Republicans and 189 Democrats, a solid 47-seat majority.
Interestingly, a RealClearPolitics forecast based on the average of numerous polls has a forecast of 219 Republicans and 182 Democrats, with 34 seats in the too-close-to-call category.
If those toss-ups were decided in the same ratio as the likely winners (55% Republican to 45% Democrat), that would sort the undecided into 19 Republicans and 15 Democrats. That would produce a final House of 238 Republicans and 197 Democrats, almost exactly the result that the historical track record predicts.
But can we go beyond statistics and polls to discern idiosyncratic factors that could push the results away from the central tendency? There are two.
The first is the trend of Hispanics and African-Americans toward Republicans and away from Democrats.
The Hispanic vote has historically been around 70% for Democrats, but recent polls show the Republicans may capture more than 50% of the Hispanic vote this time because Hispanics are trending conservative and are culturally anti-abortion, anti-crime and in favor of controlling the border.
Hispanics make up about 20% of the total population. If you shift 20% of voters by 20% in preference, that yields a 4% gain for Republicans in the overall vote. With many districts split close to 50/50, a four-point pickup is huge. We’ve already seen this dynamic with Republican gains in seats on the Texas/Mexican border that were solidly Democratic until this year.
The same trend is clear in the African-American community. They are 12% of the electorate and vote about 90% Democrat. However, recent voting results and polls show that the African-American vote could go as much as 20% for Republicans this time.
A 10% gain in a 12% community adds another 1.2% to the Republican column. Crime and the economy are the big issues for African-Americans. Combined with the Hispanic shift, this could put over five percentage points in the Republican column, enough to tip a lot of close races to Republicans.
The second trend that could push the results away from statistical tendencies is Biden’s very low approval ratings. Right now, Biden’s approval rating is 41.8% based on the average of 11 major polls. However, the polls contained in the average include some conducted as long ago as Aug. 15 (Marist) or Aug. 12 (NBC News) when Biden was riding high based on some legislative accomplishments.
The more recent polls show Biden at 38% approval (Reuters, Aug, 30). So it is likely that Biden is in a real-time downtrend back toward the 39% level he held most of the summer.
Based on these idiosyncratic variables, it seems reasonable to push the expectation of 241 Republicans and 189 Democrats to an adjusted result of 245 Republicans to 185 Democrats, a 34-seat gain for Republicans, leading to a 60-seat Republican majority.
In summary, my forecast for the 2022 midterm House result as of now is: Republicans – 245 seats, Democrats – 190 seats.
Forecasting the outcome in the Senate is both easier and harder than forecasting the House. It’s easier because there are fewer races and even fewer contests that are genuinely competitive. It’s harder because the smaller sample size makes it more difficult to use statistical methods. We have to go state by state and candidate by candidate to produce an accurate forecast.
The Senate has 100 members, two from each state. The current split is 50 Democrats/independents and 50 Republicans. Under the Constitution, the president of the Senate, Kamala Harris (the vice president), can break a tie vote.
This puts the Democrats in control of the Senate even with the 50/50 split.
There are 35 Senate seats in play this election. The Republicans are at a slight disadvantage going in because they currently hold 21 of the 35 seats being contested, whereas the Democrats only have to defend 14 seats. The good news for Republicans is that 16 of the 21 seats they are defending are rated “Solid” or “Likely” to stay Republican by The Cook Political Report.
The Democrats have nine out of 14 seats they are defending rated “Solid” or “Likely.” This means that only 10 of the 35 Senate seats in this election are truly competitive. Control of the Senate will come down to those 10. The Republicans and Democrats currently hold five of the competitive seats each.
To control the Senate, either party has to hold their five competitive seats and take one from the other party. If you lose a seat, you have to pick up another just to stay even. It’s that close.
My current best estimate is that Republicans will retain Florida, North Carolina and Ohio. Likewise, the Democrats should retain their seats in Colorado and New Hampshire. This means control of the Senate comes down to Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
If that list seems familiar it should. Those were the same five states that were hotly contested in the 2020 presidential race. All five went for Biden. Although those remaining races are all close, I rate Nevada and Georgia as wins for Republicans.
Those two wins represent a pickup of two Senate seats for Republicans since both are currently held by Democrat incumbents. I rate Arizona a win for Mark Kelly, which is a hold for the Democrats.
Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are both extremely close, but right now one would have to rate those as wins for the Democrats. That’s a pickup of two for the Democrats since both seats are currently held by Republicans.
If that forecast holds, we’re back to a 50-50 Senate. A few states would change from Democrat to Republican (Nevada and Georgia) or from Republican to Democrat (Wisconsin and Pennsylvania) but the total 50-50 split would be unchanged.
I have one other forecast: The current forecast will change. They always do when you’re still two months away.
We could see Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin tip Republican over the next two months. Georgia could remain in the Democratic column. All I can say is I’ll be watching closely and keeping you updated every step of the way.
A prudent investor would keep an above-average allocation to cash, both to withstand the volatility from potential wild cards and to profit from attractive entry points on certain assets while others are losing fortunes.
Strap in, it’s going to be a bumpy but fascinating ride.
The GOP should have enough to maybe take the House.
Yeah, and I am a Chinese Jet Pilot
For the record, there was a concerted effort in HELLINOIS to ensure a HoR seat was lost. First, the outflow of people from HELLINOIS to other states. About 150,000 families left the state in the run up to Covid and through Covid.
Second, so many HELLINOIS residents REFUSED to answer the census. I was among them and actively campaigning and informing people NOT to answer it to reduce HELLINOIS' representation in Congress in favor of other more sane states. It was our way of diminishing this states role in Electoral College also.
Third, the number of companies that moved out of HELLINOIS to other states also further diminished this states population. Even as recently as Caterpillar, Citadel, Boeing and others moved their Corporate HQ's out of HELLINOIS which put a hurt on the state's tax base.
Today, McDonalds which relocated from tax-friendly OakBrook IL to Chicago announced they're being courted by numerous other states to move out of Chicago, and are explicitly citing Chicago's rampant crime rate which is affecting McDonald's new near west side Chicago HQ and employees.
The news for HELLINOIS just gets worse and worse, this state is circling the drain. So glad we lost one HoR seat, I'm aiming for a second with a special census before I leave this shithole of a state.
House yes. Senate, no.
Last time I made that prediction was 1994 and boy, was I wrong! I hope I am again.
And then you average in the Dominion voting machine adjudication rates and well......
Wang! Is that you?
Good article. Thanks for posting.
Saving for later comparison to reality.
How will the vote fraud be stopped?
They did it with a presidential election this is a piece of cake a walk in the park
Democrats took 60 or 70 years to perfect the art of thefting elections...
They will not easily give it up now.
No way Ron Johnson loses in WI.
51 is the bare minimum Repubs will have in the Senate.
PA and AZ could go either way. Send donations directly to Oz and Masters to help them out. 51-53 is what we will end up with, most likely, depending on how those 2 states go.
Outside shot at more than 53 in a wave. NH, CO, WA, CT - all long shots but not impossible in a wave. WA has an absolutely terrific Republican candidate, and her best shot, if she had the funding, is with a “time for change” type of campaign.
And let’s not forget that we replaced several RINOs with Trump endorsed Maga candidates so Senate will be a little bit less swampy...
True… most likely not the Senate this time around.
If it weren’t for the judges I wouldn’t even care as long as we got the house. We need 51 in the senate just to stop judges from being confirmed. Biden already has appointed more then any other President in a first term. We’re stuck with them for 35 years. They destroy more then any congress could dream of.
Nothing will change. Cheating is rampant and with mail in balloting, the Demonrats will stay in power.
Really, Jim?
Fetterwoman is going to take Pennsylvania?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.