Posted on 09/13/2022 7:35:12 AM PDT by fwdude
- Yes, religious companies should be exempt from covering PrEP. - No, all insurers should be required to cover PrEP, as is currently the law. - I don’t know.
(Excerpt) Read more at poz.com ...
Do your part, guys.
41% i don’t know
I don’t know why the “I don’t knows.” This is an obvious answer.
Here's an ad idea:
"PrEP, Making sin safe again!"
There is no enumerated power for the federal to have the regulation in the first place.
Or just making health "safer" by mitigating inherent hazards in a completely OPTIONAL behavior.
Back to my usual analogy of making Russian Roulette "safer" by replacing the 6-shooter revolver with a 10-shooter.
What is PRep?
Sin is never safe because the unrepentant don’t get fore resistant clothes.
Well, that ship sailed a LONG time ago. The list of usurpations and oppressions has again grown long.
It’s this drug that they claim prevents the spread of HIV.
Folks also claimed the jab for 90+ percent effective.
Thank you, that clears it up.
HIV in and of itself does not cause AIDS.
It's an AIDS drug that encourages bad behavior by creating a false sense of security. For instance, fags on PrEP think they can "bareback" (forego using a condom) because they're now "protected," but the STD rates in this population have shot through the stratosphere to new record highs as a result. A lot of these STD pathogens, as well as HIV, are becoming drug-resistant.
I CAN make a difference, my clicking now leaves the field with 43% voting YES....
46% now
There are other ways to wreck your immune system, this is true. The Jab may prove to be one of those. But HIV is a sure ticket to do so.
Should have quarrantined the lot when it was called GRID and let nature take its course rather than waste billions on it.
to show the stupidity of having the “i don’t know” option... and then the stupidity of having the vote again button...
i don’t know...
Headline broken.
“Should religiously-affiliated third-party payers be forced under threat of prosecution/fines/bankruptcy/imprisonment to provide explicit approval for behaviors primarily responsible for the spread of HIV/AIDS?”
Fixed it. Mostly.
https://www.poz.com/poll/religious-companies-exempt-insurance-cover-prep-hiv-prevention
Yeah, the wording is all important, putting the burden on the Religious orgs as the “recipients” of some special treatment instead of recognizing the default, inherent right to make their own choices is the goal.
Conclusions Our findings indicate that a small proportion of blood donors have not been disclosing PrEP/PEP use and therefore donating in non-compliance to donor eligibility criteria.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.