Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gas_dr

I’m not in need of any clarification.

You attempted to obfuscate the facts by ignoring that this was a care team model anesthetic and an anesthesiologist was present. You quickly turned this into “CRNA bad, doctor good” argument which was never the purpose of the original Pat at all.

You really ought to change your handle to “gaslighting_dr”. More often than not, you bloviate then accuse others of twisting your words.


66 posted on 09/12/2022 9:56:48 AM PDT by surroundedbyblue (Proud to be an Infidel & a deplorable. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: surroundedbyblue

You might want to read the original complaint.
You also don’t seem to be able to answer questions.
You said I impugned the care team model. I did not. I said CRNAs should be strictly supervised.

I asked you do you think you should be able to practice independently? This lawsuit simply reaps what the AANA has sown.

And someone else is exactly right. This is not a CRNA case. My I only complaint is that the health system would allow a pediatric heart to be done by a CRNA.


77 posted on 09/12/2022 1:01:24 PM PDT by gas_dr (Conditions of Socratic debate: Intelligence, Candor, and Good Will. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson