You might want to read the original complaint.
You also don’t seem to be able to answer questions.
You said I impugned the care team model. I did not. I said CRNAs should be strictly supervised.
I asked you do you think you should be able to practice independently? This lawsuit simply reaps what the AANA has sown.
And someone else is exactly right. This is not a CRNA case. My I only complaint is that the health system would allow a pediatric heart to be done by a CRNA.
If you have a problem with CRNAs doing pediatric cardiac cases then take it up with Texas Children’s, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Children’s
hospital of Pittsburgh, Nemours, etc.
I’m not sure where you practice, sir, but where I come from CRNAs don’t just do ASA 1s and 2s. I myself have done extensive numbers of pediatric trauma and transplant cases.
And I never accused you of impugning the care team model. Your initial posts on this thread insinuated the patient had a negative outcome because of a lack of physician-involved anesthesia care. That is demonstrably false
You seem to have a pattern of saying something, then when it gets you called you, you backpedal and deny ever having said such statement or accuse the reader of twisting your words.
Once again, gaslighting.