1st trimester-3 months-2nd trimester, whatever-it is still a human-so why is killing that little human okay at 3 months but suddenly not at 5, 6. 7 months-or 9 for that matter? If that woman is planning on getting an abortion after she knows she is probably pregnant, that is just too bad-the kid has a right to 9 months of her time in utero so he/she can be born-give the kid up for adoption and get a tubal ligation...
There is MORALITY. And there is POLITICS. If you screw up the POLITICS, you will get unlimited abortion to birth and beyond because most Americans in most states do NOT support the Zero Abortion option!
The question is, “Do you want SOME restrictions, and the right to argue for narrowing the window further, or will your demands push America into an unlimited abortion position?”
Sorry, but what is moral doesn’t win until you convince a comfortable MAJORITY to enact it. That majority doesn’t exist, and the other side is using this window of opportunity to enshrine abortion rights into Constitutions and Federal law! Once written, it will take another 50 years - or MORE - to undo it!
You’ll find out in November why?
The way to deal with slutty women: you can have your abortions but every abortion results in mandatory sterilization.
Also there is a rash of men murdering women and the man’s defense is”hey, she was inconvenient to me; why can’t I kill her?”
After all, if women can kill inconvenient babies why can’t men kill inconvenient women?