Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas judge rules coverage of anti-HIV medicine violates religious freedom
KUT ^ | Sergio Martínez-Beltrán Published September 7, 2022 | Sergio Martínez-Beltrán, Julián Aguilar

Posted on 09/07/2022 4:00:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway

A federal judge in Texas ruled on Wednesday that a mandate requiring most health insurance companies to cover medicine that prevents HIV infection violates the religious freedom of certain businesses.

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor partially resolves a lawsuit brought by Braidwood Management Inc., a Christian for-profit corporation owned by Republican mega-donor Steven Hotze that employs about 70 people.

Hotze claimed that forcing his company to cover pre-exposure prophylaxis drugs, more commonly known as PrEP, under the Affordable Care Act would make the company “facilitate and encourage homosexual behavior.”

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PrEP “reduces the risk of getting HIV from sex by about 99% … [and] the risk of getting HIV from injection drug use by at least 74%.”

The CDC recommends the use of PrEP to people at high risk of contracting HIV, including men who have sex with men.

Five counties in Texas — Bexar, Dallas, Harris, Tarrant, and Travis — have been designated by the federal government as priority areas for preventing new transmissions because of their high number of HIV diagnoses. Only Florida and California have more counties designated as priority areas.

In his ruling, O’Connor said that Braidwood and Hotze have “shown that the PrEP mandate substantially burdens its religious exercise.”

He said the defendants — the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and Secretary Xavier Becerra — have not shown how mandating the coverage of the drug “furthers a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.”

It’s unclear whether the ruling applies to other businesses beside the ones named as plaintiffs.

HHS didn’t immediately return a request for comment. The decision is likely to be appealed.

In July, the American Medical Association warned that the lawsuit could threaten more than 100 preventive health services for millions of Americans.

The attorney representing the plaintiffs, former Texas Solicitor General Jonathan Mitchell, was the mind behind Senate Bill 8 — the state law that bans abortions after six weeks and allows citizens to sue anyone who “aids or abets” an abortion.

In a July interview with the Dallas Morning News, Mitchell said he was going to challenge court rulings he sees as improperly decided, including same-sex marriage.

O’Connor also ruled that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a panel of experts in disease prevention who recommended in 2019 mandating health insurance to cover PrEP, is unconstitutional.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: affordablecareact; braidwoodmanagement; dubyajudge; lawsuit; mandate; ndtexas; reedcoconnor; reedoconnor; religiousfreedom; religiousliberty; stevenhotze; texas; voicevote

1 posted on 09/07/2022 4:00:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

That should prevent them from having to deal with Fagpox too if you ask me


2 posted on 09/07/2022 4:08:18 PM PDT by NWFree (Somebody has to say it 🤪)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What about heterosexuals with AIDS? No medication for them? And homosexuals who have AIDS, are employees, and can’t get this medication? Will they get other forms of treatment? Will that cost more?


3 posted on 09/07/2022 4:17:10 PM PDT by Lower Deck ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NWFree

They had to mention “a Christian for-profit company” owned by a “Republican mega donor” in the lede paragraph. It’s in the AP style book apparently. 🤬


4 posted on 09/07/2022 4:21:41 PM PDT by Prince of Space (Let’s Go, Brandon! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lower Deck

For the repentant Christian this is as bad as it will ever be,

For the unrepentant this is as good as they will ever see.


5 posted on 09/07/2022 4:31:01 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It is still possible to get HIV from blood transfusions or even blood contact in sports. I think this ruling is government over-reach.


6 posted on 09/07/2022 4:42:53 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
HIV don't cause AIDS.  Why so many died of it then?  At my last PE 3 years ago the young resident female MD said I'd need HIV test.  Why?  Because your age bracket more susceptible getting AIDS!  I'm not 21-yo anymore my testostorone not that high anymore, why so?  Oh I don't F around, why that even necessary?  It looked like they were following some NIH protocol, hook me in to fake AZT treatment to kill me?  I've been reading Dr. Stefan Lanka's statement from 20 years ago.

Germany's Court rules HIV not proven to cause 'AIDS' per German microbiologist Dr. Stefan Lanka, Ph.D.

by Paul King Jun. 22, 2003 at
https://la.indymedia.org/news/2003/06/66369.php

After years of claims by the AIDS establishment that a link between HIV and immune supression had been established a High Court found the claim without merit and a unfounded deception. This is the first legal trail of the HUV/AIDS hypothesis and a historic defeat for AID$ Inc.

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson

The United Nations Centre for Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva
8-14 Avenue de la Paix
1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

To all Heads of Government and all Heads of State

To all NGOs

Legal proceedings against the "Deutscher Bundestag", the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany: Because of the intentional continuation of acts of killing and manslaughter (§ 220a StGB Germany) by the German Parliament.

During the last six years proofs have been collected for the following actions that have taken place inside Germany:

The State intentionally is using non-valid tests to persuade healthy persons to take a deadly long-term medication. The persons, being healthy before being tested die during the long-term-medication. The German Parliament, since years intentionally is securing that this crime continues.

Course of Events on January 15th 2001 at the District Court (Landgericht) of Dortmund:

Judge Hackmann announced the statement of the "Bundesgesundheitsbehörde", the Federal German Health Authorities, which says that in connection with AIDS there has never been isolated a virus (Dr. Marcus, Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI) Berlin). The judge figured out that the German Bundestag had been backing the lie of the Federal Health Authorities (RKI, Dr. Marcus, 9.3.95) about a successful isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS in the course of a petition (Art. 17, Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, Pet. 5-13-15-2002-010526).

The trial was based on actions of the defendant which were caused by the misleading statement made by the RKI (Dr. Marcus) on the 9th March 1995, that there were photographs of the isolated HI-virus inside the publications of Montagnier (1983) and Gallo (1984). The judge proved the untruthfulness of this statement using Dr. Marcus‘ statement itself. The court imposed a suspended sentence of 8 months of jail because of attempted coercion of the authorities to adhere and act according to law and order.

The document of the German Bundestag DS 12/8591 holds proof that the Bundestag had already known in 1994 that neither Montagnier (1983) nor Gallo (1984) had isolated any virus in connection with AIDS. Based on this the Bundestag safeguarded the persistent lie of the AIDS information campaign (RKI) from 9th March 1995 about the successful isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS. As a consequence of non-tolerating this lie and because of non-tolerating the deadly consequences of this lie, the trial took place on 15th January 2001.

It is impossible – as far as laboratory conditions are concerned – to develop a valid Virus-antibody-test, if the virus has not been isolated before. Every layman understands that an individual proof for an infection with a virus is impossible, if the existence of the virus has never been generally proven. This knowledge of the German health authorities, that the tests are not validated, can be proven via the authorities‘ documents themselves. The error concerning the test’s validity is spread and supported by the authorities – against better knowledge.

With two more petitions the Bundestag safeguarded the default of the responsible authorities, not to carry out the law (§63 AMG, Stufenplan II), to do studies and observations to protect persons taking the AIDS-Medicine, the chemotherapy AZT (Pet. 5-13-15-2002-058744 and Pet. 5-13-15-212-023567a).

The health authorities and the Bundestag know that there will be no test method to prove an HIV-Infection, as long as HIV has not been isolated. And there is no doubt that AZT – as well as the HIV-medications in general – are deadly themselves when used as long-term-medication.

In the course of the proceedings of the petitions the Bundestag created an apparent peace of law – by means of deliberately untruthful statements. President of the German Parliament Wolfgang Thierse regards untruthful behaviour of this kind (as shown by the Bundestag) as being justified by the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court). A videotape documenting an interview (28th June 1995) shows that his predecessor in office, Prof. Rita Süssmuth did know, that there had never been any proofs for a virus in connection with AIDS and that there are no proofs for the claims of infectivitiy.

Still pending in the Bundestag is the petition Pet. 2-14-15-212-02608. It is lodging a complaint against the legal authorities, which stayed passive after getting the attention of the proofs for these act of killings. Enclosed with the complaint were so many proofs, which had made it necessary for the Bundestag to take actions right after perusal, to stop the continuation of these acts of killings by the state. Within the last six months every single member of the German Bundestag was informed six times via mail about these acts of killing by the state.

The intention of the German Bundestag to safeguard killings by the state after gaining insight into the facts must be regarded as proven, especially because of the fact that several petitions were rejected by means of untruthful statements. The German Bundestag and every individual member of the Bundestag intentionally safeguards acts of killings by the state by deliberately misleading the public. Healthy people are intentionally lead into a deadly medication via tests with invalid results - and then die.

The criminal law of the BRD and especially § 220a StGB (Genocide) protects citizens from act of killings organised by a state which is deliberately misleading the public. It also protects the citizens binding the legal authorities to take actions after perusal. The prosecuting attorneys attended the trial on 15th January 2001 at the Landgericht Dortmund and learned about the facts – in front of the public. Their passivity afterwards serves as a further proof for their further intention in this matter. (LG Dortmund, Ns 70 Js 878/99 14(XVII) K 11/00)

Karl Krafeld and Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dortmund and Stuttgart, 14.3.2001

Science, Medicine and Human Rights (Wissenschaft, Medizin und Menschenrechte e.V.), Germany
Albrechtstr. 17, D-44137 Dortmund, 0711 2220601, Lanka@free.de

for other studing of hiv and aids you can see this very intresting site:

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/epapadopoulos.htm


or the forum

http://www.aidsRC.org

7 posted on 09/07/2022 5:39:52 PM PDT by wannabegeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lower Deck
"What about heterosexuals with AIDS? No medication for them? And homosexuals who have AIDS, are employees, and can't get this medication? Will they get other forms of treatment? Will that cost more?"

Tune in tomorrow and find out if Big Butt Billy and his dog Rammer will find the necessary meds to keep Little Johnny Sweet Cheeks from coming down with monkey pox, and the creeping crud.....

8 posted on 09/07/2022 6:17:48 PM PDT by unread ("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The judge is wrong


9 posted on 09/07/2022 8:46:49 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Giant meteor 2022!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Definitely overreaching. If we stop supporting preventative medicine because of life style choices it’s going to get ugly really quick. People don’t stop and think this through.


10 posted on 09/07/2022 8:48:51 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Giant meteor 2022!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wannabegeek

Maybe you should seek out HIV and report back your findings of how it doesn’t lead to AIDS. *eye roll*


11 posted on 09/07/2022 9:19:57 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Giant meteor 2022!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
Not my finding?  If Stefan Lanka said all claims about ‘viruses’ as pathogens are false, then all so-called human pathogenic virus don't exist that include HIV, SARS-CoV-2, measles.  All so-called vaccines are unnecessary and are toxins to the human body.

https://truthseeker.se/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Dr-Lanka-The-Irish-Light.pdf

12 posted on 09/07/2022 11:47:16 PM PDT by wannabegeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This ruling should be LESS about HIV/gays/religion/etc, and more about GOVERNMENT OVERREACH because they are forcing every company to provide things to their employees!

THIS IS FORCING SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS, BY THE US GOVERNMENT, BUT USING COMPANIES AS THE VEHICLE! THIS IS SINGLE-PAYER WITH A THIRD PARTY SUBSERVIENT TO THE GOVERNMENT (THE COMPANY)!!

The US government should NOT be able to force me to provide you anything - PERIOD! it is not their job to tell me how to run my business!!


13 posted on 09/08/2022 7:14:51 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Diversity is necessary; diverse points of views will not be tolerated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson