Posted on 09/06/2022 7:02:56 AM PDT by libstripper
Both sides have to agree on who’s the special master wonder what strings the feds will pull?.
Amendment 4 - ( Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791. )
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Having determined that the exercise of jurisdiction is appropriate and that Plaintiff has
standing to bring the instant requests, the Court next considers the need for further review of the
seized material, as relates to Rule 41(g) and matters of privilege.
Although some of the seized items (e.g., articles of clothing) appear to be readily
identifiable as personal property, the parties’ submissions suggest the existence of genuine disputes
as to (1) whether certain seized documents constitute personal or presidential records, and
(2) whether certain seized personal effects have evidentiary value. Because those disputes are
bound up with Plaintiff’s Rule 41(g) request and involve issues of fact, the Court “must receive
evidence” from the parties thereon. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) (“The court must receive evidence
on any factual issue necessary to decide the motion.”). That step calls for comprehensive review
of the seized property.>>> They must have found some of the bloody shirts and stuff from the Nicole Simpson murder. What articles of clothing? Melania’s underwear? These people in the FBI are disgusting. and yes they are tainted and cannot be trusted as the judge so orders.
😊
The USC is kind of like a women..noone knows what either one is.
So..Romney or Cheney?
Bob Barr?
Yes, it is.
Carter, Clinton, Obama, all Dems, and WBush might as well be. Yep, they would all sign off on it.
What do they care, they already got their two terms (and Carter's 97).
Or leak anything embarrassing.
40 years with is a lot files and not a few paper thin files that may have been stuck in a box with classified documents. They saw them, knew what they were, weren’t allowed to take them but took them and read them any way. Pure evil.
worth not with
Like Andrew Breitbart, who died just 20 days after promising at the 2012 CPAC convention to release damaging videos of Obama from his college days?
-PJ
They don’t qualify has to be someone with top security clearance to see the papers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.