[Gunslingr3]

Your data still showed no such thing. It only showed a bunch of red squares. So, you trust NASA I take it. Problem is, I don’t believe a thing coming out of these agencies anymore. Even NASA have shown their true colors.

You’re probably right. I bet NASA is faking the satellite data in the infrared spectrum to just make it seem like the Russians are retreating toward Kherson city under fire. Let’s ignore that.

When the Russians retreat from Kherson, what do you think will be Moscow’s explanation for what happened? Do you think they’ll use the ‘feint’ excuse again, like they did at Sumy, Kiev, and Chernigov? Or do you think they try to sell it as a goodwill gesture in the midst of war?

I would like to see your comment ‘on the record’ so we can refer to it later.

[Robert DeLong]

Listen, they have the technology to provide actual photos, not the BS that you presented. So, why are they not releasing the photos. As the saying goes, a picture is worth a 1,000 words.

I have no clue, but what are your thoughts if Russia wins this conflict in the final analysis. Just for the record.

You seem to believe that many Russians are against this conflict, and you may be right. If Russia is as bad as you believe it to be, will the press lie to the people, like our press did about Vietnam to sway public opinion against the war? We were winning the Vietnam war. The North Vietnamese did not defeat us. The press did that with their lies. Will the press in Russia replicate that tactic to lose in Ukraine?

Because that is really the only way Russia gets defeated.