Posted on 08/30/2022 6:11:31 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Fox News anchor Brian Kilmeade said Tuesday on FBN’s “Kudlow” that suburban white women were “freaked out” by the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, hurting Republicans in polling for the midterm election.
Kilmeade said, “Well, the three things the Democratic Party is polling well in, coronavirus still, which is inexplicable; abortion because they are pro-choice and a lot of the zero tolerance, when it comes to these states has a lot of people freaked out. I think the 15 weeks seems to be – even if you’re the most pro-life person, your neighbor probably isn’t – so how do you govern? So I think those are the issues.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
“Then why are there total bans in some states?”
Either they existed 100 years ago (Arizona) OR they were passed knowing they would not take effect because of Roe.
States NOW have the right to make abortion laws, and those laws WILL be adjusted to suit the people in that state. And what you will find is almost no state - IF ANY - keep a law that totally bans abortion. Kansas is hardly a raging liberal state, but people freaked out at the very prospect of a total ban.
Morally, it is different. But politics involves what is possible, not pure morality.
“Either they existed 100 years ago (Arizona) OR they were passed knowing they would not take effect because of Roe.”
No, nope, only passed recently when the Mississippi case was headed to the Supreme Court.
The total ban is nonsense, always has been. People always righteously throw up the rape and incest argument, which happens but only rarely. So, the solution to all of this, they maintain, is to open the floodgates and let 60 million babies be murdered.
Arizona has a law dating back before statehood banning almost all abortions. It passed in 1864 and may or may not be in effect.
It also has a recent law criminalizing abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.
I believe there IS good political support statewide for the recent law. Doubt there is much support for the 1864 law. Both were on hold until the right to make laws was returned to the state.
“Five days after the Supreme Court’s decision, Brnovich said the state’s 158-year-old law remains in effect.
Under the 158-year-old law, anyone who facilitates a procedure that causes a miscarriage or abortion can face two to five years in prison. While Arizona’s law makes it a crime to aid a woman in a miscarriage or abortion, the law does allow for such procedures if they are “necessary to save her life.”
“Our office has concluded that the Arizona Legislature has made its intentions clear regarding abortion laws,” Brnovich wrote on Twitter earlier in the month.”
“It passed in 1864”
I cannot damn believe you hardheaded people. I am intimately acquainted with Louisiana and Mississippi and their abortion laws were passed very lately and the one in Louisiana had “trigger” laws in it, based on what the Supreme Court would rule on the upcoming Mississippi law.
Other states did the same thing. Now, you can go back in history and find any law you want in some state. ALL the abortion laws that were on the books previous to Roe v Wade were declared unconstitutional long ago, so the states had to start over. Louisiana has been passing laws against abortion for at least twenty years, and they were all shot down in the Federal courts based on the Roe v Wade ruling.
Liar. Worse than a Dem.
They lie as if ALL abortions are illegal.
Try reading and LEARNING, Mr Know It All!
“Five days after the Supreme Court’s decision, Brnovich said the state’s 158-year-old law remains in effect.”
Brnovich is the Arizona State AG.
“Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said Wednesday that a 158-year old Arizona law declaring that anyone who facilitates a procedure that causes a miscarriage or abortion can face a prison sentence between two to five years is now in effect and effectively bans abortion in the state.
“Our office has concluded that the Arizona legislature has made its intentions clear regarding abortions laws,” Brnovich’s office said in a Tweeted out statement. “(The law) is back in effect and will not be repealed in 90 days by SB1164. We will soon be asking the court to vacate the injunction which was put in place following Roe v. Wade in light of the Dobbs decision earlier this month.”
https://www.azmirror.com/blog/ag-says-arizona-territorial-ban-on-abortion-now-law-of-the-land/
Kilmeade lives in a bubble
Play long to get along
We still have that here
Fewer than the Bush dynasty but still here
Feminism biggest culprit that and racism and slavery seen as original sins of humanity now
Truly white liberals wee wee or vaggie
Both make it happen
Without them not enough minorities to get over the finish line
Where I live women are fairly solid honestly
Another observation is as folks get younger from boomers down they get softer on culture incrementally
Men find the idea of Asian women - sweet sensitive and comforting with no harshness - attractive.
That ideal used to be a part of how White women were portrayed in movies.
Gail Russell in the John Wayne Western, Angel and the Badman, is the perfect example.
All abortion bans need to be from conception forward and the pro-life movement is failing to insist on that.
It would only take two people to make that happen.
Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life.
Lila Rose of Live Action.
The Kansas proposal failed because it was a murky mess.
Please explain why I should, according to you, endorse laws that would allow someone to kill my baby daughter or baby son for any period of time from conception forward.
I, as a man, do not want any woman to be legally authorized to murder my baby daughter or baby son within a 12-to-15 week window.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.