Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert DeLong
While his response was totally unacceptable, especially given the fact that he also said there was no fraud in the 2020 election.

He used careful weasel words.

He actually said, to the effect: I have not seen any evidence of significant fraud.

It is difficult to see something when you actively avoid looking for it.

8 posted on 08/27/2022 7:35:10 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Can’t see what you do not look for, and he never even bothered to look because he is a scumbag.


11 posted on 08/27/2022 7:37:18 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Depends on the definition of SIGNIFICANT


24 posted on 08/27/2022 9:11:46 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

There is no definition for the converse, i.e. “insignificant fraud”, meanwhile.


30 posted on 08/27/2022 12:48:08 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson