Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK’s COVID-19 Response Was ‘Too Draconian’: PM Hopeful Truss
epoch times ^ | 26 August A.D. 2022 | Alexander Zhang

Posted on 08/26/2022 9:53:48 AM PDT by lightman

Foreign Secretary Liz Truss has said the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was “too draconian” and that she would “never impose a lockdown” if she becomes prime minister.

Truss, the frontrunner in the race to replace Boris Johnson as Conservative Party leader and prime minister, said she questioned the lockdown measures though she was not on the committee making the decisions on the response to COVID-19.

Speaking at the penultimate leadership contest hustings, held in Norwich on Aug. 25, she said: “I think when COVID happened we were all hugely shocked. And there was a discussion about what the response should be. And clearly, in retrospect, we did do too much. You know, it was too draconian.”

“I don’t think we should have closed schools,” she added.

Truss said she had been one of the key voices around the Cabinet table arguing in favour of easing lockdowns.

“My view is we did go too far, particularly on keeping schools closed,” she said. “I’ve got two teenage daughters and know how difficult it was for children and parents and I would not have a lockdown again.”

She told the audience: “I can assure you and this group here today that I would never impose a lockdown if I am selected as prime minister.”

‘Lessons We Should Learn’

It comes after her rival Rishi Sunak claimed in a Spectator interview he had often been the sole critic of government decision-making during the pandemic.

The former chancellor said the government never properly examined the likely side-effects of the drastic measures despite plunging the country into three national lockdowns.

He said one of the government’s biggest mistakes was giving too much power to scientists and claimed the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) edited its minutes to hide dissenting opinions.

Asked about this at the Norwich hustings, Sunak said he had been talking about the “lessons we should learn” from the pandemic.

“This is not to second guess the decisions we made at the time, which were extraordinarily difficult for everyone involved,” he said.

“Everyone was doing their absolute best at the time to do what they thought was right for the country. These were impossible decisions. But what I was talking about was having now been through it and had the experience of it, what can we learn from it?”

‘Autocratic Streak’

Commenting on Sunak’s interview, Fraser Nelson, the editor of The Spectator, wrote in The Daily Telegraph: “An autocratic streak took hold of the government and overpowered a weak prime minister—and did so because our democratic safeguards failed.”

But some of those who participated in government decision-making at the time rejected Sunak’s version of events.

Boris Johnson’s former communications chief, Lee Cain, said: “It would have been morally irresponsible of the government not to implement lockdown in spring 2020—the failure to do so would have killed tens of thousands of people who survived COVID.”

Cain said Number 10, the Treasury, and the Department of Health and Social Care “met multiple times daily and discussed the trade-offs.”

Dominic Cummings, Johnson’s former senior adviser, said Sunak’s comments were “dangerous rubbish.”

A Number 10 spokesman said: “At every point, ministers made collective decisions which considered a wide range of expert advice available at the time in order to protect public health.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: coronafascism; covid1984; lockdown; truss; uk
“An autocratic streak took hold of the government and overpowered a weak prime minister—and did so because our democratic safeguards failed.”
1 posted on 08/26/2022 9:53:48 AM PDT by lightman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lightman

Duh.


2 posted on 08/26/2022 10:02:26 AM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Unlimited emergency powers must be removed from the executive branch or else it will all happen again.


3 posted on 08/26/2022 10:06:53 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Yes, now they were all opposed to lockdowns. Like after WWII, when you could hardly find a German who would admit to ever supporting Hitler.


4 posted on 08/26/2022 10:09:37 AM PDT by Tipllub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Ant the ability to re-declare the same emergency after they expire. IIRC, it was Michigan that the courts struck down the emergency, but she just changed the verbiage a bit and re-declared it.


5 posted on 08/26/2022 10:10:05 AM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Too draconian.

Okaaaay...

Isn’t that a little like half-pregnant...


6 posted on 08/26/2022 10:28:41 AM PDT by mewzilla (We need to repeal RCV wherever it's in use and go back to dumb voting machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

But forced, deadly jabs are fine.


7 posted on 08/26/2022 11:00:57 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson