To: Ge0ffrey
Reinhart still has to explain why he didn't recuse himself since he was the judge for Trump v Hillary, Comey, Stro etc..and after presiding for a while, he recused himself.
He definitely should have recused himself for this case.
6 posted on
08/18/2022 11:47:48 AM PDT by
Sacajaweau
( )
To: Sacajaweau
39 posted on
08/18/2022 12:03:55 PM PDT by
Eagles6
(Welcome to the Matrix . Orwell's "1984" was a warning, not an instruction manual.)
To: Sacajaweau
Rats never recuse. Never.
To: Sacajaweau
What are the specific grounds for recusal?
To: Sacajaweau
I think the prior recusal was because of his close connection to Epstein, not because he hated Trump. That is always allowed in DC.
To: Sacajaweau
Reinhart still has to explain why he didn't recuse himself How about this:
Apparently Trump nixed Reinhart's candidacy for consideration to the Supreme Court during Trump's first term,
Animus Max.
109 posted on
08/24/2022 9:31:31 AM PDT by
spokeshave
(Get ahead by banning fossil fools, like McConnell, Biden, Pelosi, Feinstein, Schumer, Leahy, etc.)
To: Sacajaweau
He definitely should have recused himself for this case.The DimWITS have pictures of the judge's activities. He was made an offer he couldn't refuse, or else.
111 posted on
08/25/2022 1:37:47 PM PDT by
politicianslie
(Those who got vaxxed need to update their wills. You are a guinea pig in a dangerous drug trial.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson