Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The trade ban that wasn't: US allows 94% of restricted tech exports to China anyway
The Register ^ | 17 August 2022 | Tobias Mann

Posted on 08/17/2022 11:25:12 AM PDT by ShadowAce

US Commerce Department can make all the noise it wants about limiting tech exports to China, but it is reportedly doing little to actual stem the flow of components and equipment.

The Wall Street Journal said on Tuesday that efforts by Uncle Sam to prevent key technologies from falling into the hands of rogue foreign powers — China in particular – may not be having the intended effect. In all, 2,652 export licenses for restricted tech to China were granted by the Commerce Dept in 2020, 94 percent of the total requested.

The newspaper reported that of the $125 billion in exports to China in 2020, less than half a percent were subject to licensing requirements, and of those that did, the Commerce Dept approved the overwhelming majority of requests.

The WSJ alleges that US policy intended to limit the export of technologies deemed a national security risk aren’t being effectively enforced, and America continues to ship a wide array of semiconductor, aerospace, and AI/ML tech to China.

America has taken an increasingly nationalist approach to export control over the past two administrations in a rather explicit bid to deny China access to advanced chipmaking tech. In public at least.

The Commerce Department’s latest bans, announced last week, prevent the unlicensed export of ultra-wide bandgap semiconductor materials, electronic computer-aided design (ECAD) technology, and pressure gain combustion (PGC) technology. These technologies have applications in the production of next-gen semiconductor tech including those required to manufacturer chips based on 3nm process tech.

The ban is only the latest in a series of measures aimed at stifling Chinese chip development, which have only ramped up in the lead up to the passage of the CHIPS Act funding earlier this month.

In early July, the US reportedly began a pressure campaign in the hopes of convincing the Netherlands to block Dutch semiconductor equipment maker ASML from selling deep ultraviolet (DUV) lithography tech to China.

DUV is previous-gen manufacturing tech, and has been superseded in recent years by extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography used to produce 7nm and smaller process nodes. However, there remains significant demand for DUV equipment in China. A BusinessKorea report from the time indicates SMIC, China’s largest state-based foundry operator, was planning to invest $11 billion to grow its DUV capacity by 2023.

Meanwhile, the US is reportedly weighing banning the export of US-made equipment and intellectual property needed to produce flash memory chips with greater than 128 layers in China.

However, recent developments have called the efficacy of these measures into question.

Late last month TechInsights, a US-based semiconductor analysis firm, reported that SMIC had not only managed to produce chips based on a 7nm process node, but had been manufacturing it in volume since last year. We note that some experts believe SMIC's yields may be low at this stage. The technology also appears to be a copy of a design used by foundry giant TSMC. Until recently, it was believed that SMIC's most advanced process tech topped out at 14nm.

Whether or not a failure by the Commerce Department to effectively enforce exports bans are to blame for SMIC’s recent advancements remains unclear.

The Register reached out to the Commerce Department for comment; we’ll let you know what we hear back. ®


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china

1 posted on 08/17/2022 11:25:12 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; JosephW; martin_fierro; Still Thinking; zeugma; Vinnie; ironman; Egon; raybbr; AFreeBird; ...

2 posted on 08/17/2022 11:25:59 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
The trade ban that wasn't: US allows 94% of restricted tech exports to China anyway

Yeah, but Hunter and "The Big Guy" are raking in megabucks!

3 posted on 08/17/2022 11:30:30 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Ultra MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

4 posted on 08/17/2022 11:30:38 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
"The WSJ alleges that US policy intended to limit the export of technologies deemed a national security risk..."

Why would we worry about THAT security risk when Donald Trump stole all of our nuclear secrets and secretly sold them to our enemies?

Just kidding...channeling our liberal kooks' response. I'm ahead of the curve!

5 posted on 08/17/2022 11:35:31 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“May your neighbors respect you, trouble neglect you, angels protect you and heaven accept you”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Under Biden’s Weaponized Banana Republic, the USA is Trading Outpost for the Chinese.


6 posted on 08/17/2022 11:40:31 AM PDT by Chgogal (Uncle Brandon wants your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

And we have the nerve to call other governments corrupt. Our politicians would sell their own mothers if it increased their bank accounts.

You shouldn’t trust anything they say or do.


7 posted on 08/17/2022 11:40:41 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (The nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master and deserves one. Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yuleeyahoo

“ And we have the nerve to call other governments corrupt.”

The United States government is the MOST corrupt in the entire world (probably in the entire history of civilization)…and it isn’t even close.


8 posted on 08/17/2022 11:44:54 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (Make Orwell Fiction Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

2020 is not Biden admin.


9 posted on 08/17/2022 11:50:27 AM PDT by stylin19a (It's a fine line tween a numerator and denominator. only a fraction of people will find this funny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Trump needs to fix this when he’s our new President.


10 posted on 08/17/2022 11:54:00 AM PDT by GOPJ (The FBI has been getting more brazen about its political thuggery this last year - Mark Steyn )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal; stylin19a
Under Biden’s Weaponized Banana Republic...

It's not even any particular administration--it's the bureaucratic class that have jobs for life. They are able to run circles around most politicians.

11 posted on 08/17/2022 11:54:54 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Good point. Funny they didn’t comment on 2019. Wonder if shutting down the
Federal Government for the Wuhan virus had anything to do with the Commerce Department not enforcing the rules.


12 posted on 08/17/2022 11:55:56 AM PDT by Chgogal (Uncle Brandon wants your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Agreed. But Biden like Obama will add to the DC Bureaucracy and they are not adding free enterprise small government types to the payroll.


13 posted on 08/17/2022 11:59:02 AM PDT by Chgogal (Uncle Brandon wants your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal; ShadowAce

I think ShadowAce has it right. The deep state is entrenched. doesn’t matter who is in charge on top.
What i do hope is, that Pres. Trump or somebody he trusts is taking all this down to be addressed should he run and get elected.


14 posted on 08/17/2022 12:37:02 PM PDT by stylin19a (It's a fine line tween a numerator and denominator. only a fraction of people will find this funny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

I totally agree.


15 posted on 08/17/2022 12:41:33 PM PDT by Chgogal (Uncle Brandon wants your money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson