I don’t think this is the fix you were looking for.
Mariupol had a populace of around 450,000 people before
this war.
Large portions of it stand in ruins today. Report say there
are about 100,000 people left there.
I was informed that the people of Mariupol wanted Russia to
come in. I find that rather laughable, considering.
Russia’s captured territory is identical to the AZOV
natural gas preserves. It’s now capturing the major oil
preserves of the Ukraine.
What has that to do with past grievances?
This hasn’t solved a single thing, other than to give
Russia more natural resources, which I submit you folks
have totally run from as a reason.
If Russia is there to save people who love it, it has a
rather poor way of doing it. Destroy their cities, inflict
as much pain and suffering as it can, while people run
away leaving their life’s belongings in the rear view.
You will choose what you believe.
I find it plausible that natos actions since 2013 have felt like a threat to Russia.
Russia has captured most mineral and energy resource territories and I speculate they intend to complete capturing the sea ports - rendering Ukraine a landlocked state, while creating a buffer.
The only people I support are the individual citizens of Ukraine and Russia. Neither Gov’t.
But in terms of a threat to freedom worldwide, the homoglobalists of the WEF/Soros/etc. are a much larger threat than Russia. So if Putin wins, great. We will deal with him later. Trump did a great job with Russia.
Until then, the enemy of my enemy is my friend…