Posted on 08/11/2022 9:20:40 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
There’s no shocking video of beachgoers gawking at massive explosions here like there was with the strike in Crimea. In fact, this story is thinly sourced. *Something* happened at Belarus’s Zyabrovka military airport, enough to warrant an official explanation, but that’s as much as we know. Surveillance video from very far away detected a large flash on the horizon.
CCTV footage has emerged of the explosion at the airfield in #Belarus which happened overnight.
As I reported earlier in the thread, this base is completely controlled by #Russia these days and the launchpad for many bombings of #Ukraine.
Is this just an engine fire? pic.twitter.com/IafyIWB31n
— Tim White (@TWMCLtd) August 11, 2022
That was nothing more than a “technical incident” in which “the engine of a vehicle caught fire after replacement,” said the Belarusian Defense Ministry. Rumors on Telegram say otherwise, though:
Citing eyewitnesses, the Belarusian Hajun project, a social media channel that follows the Ukrainian war, tweeted there had been “at least eight explosions” overnight on Wednesday near the airfield in Ziabrovka, in the Gomel region…
Satellite images taken at the end of June have indicated the presence of Russian military equipment at Ziabrovka, which borders Ukraine’s Chernihiv region. Belarusian journalists have also tracked the movement of such equipment since spring, independent Russian-language news outlet Meduza reported.
On July 7, Ukrainian armed forces said that Belarus had transferred the airfield to Russia and “measures are being taken to equip the Russian military base” there.
If this was Ukraine’s handiwork, no long-range mystery weapon like the one that laid waste to the Saki air base in Crimea was necessary. Zyabrovka is a stone’s throw from Ukraine, north of Kiev.
BREAKING:
8 large explosions reported from Ziabrauka airfield near Homel in Belarus.
Lots of Russian military gear is stationed there & the Russians often launch attack against Ukraine from Ziabrauka.
Ukraine might have counterattacked Belarusian territory for the first time
pic.twitter.com/ACGGEUlPDI— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) August 10, 2022
If you’re looking for innocent explanations, note that Russia and Belarus had previously scheduled live-fire military exercises between August 9 and 25. Maybe the explosions heard last night were nothing more than test fire, part of the drills. But the alternative is also possible: Having just shocked Russia with a surprise attack on an air field deep in the south, maybe the Ukrainians tried to deepen the shock with a second attack way up north. Russian air assets located at the Belarusian base might soon be redeployed to Crimea to replace the jets destroyed in the Saki strike, after all. Taking them out in Belarus before they could be moved might be part of Ukraine’s plan to starve Russia of key weapons.
In fact, according to one paper, Russian cargo planes arrived at the base just yesterday, possibly to supply air defense equipment. “The Zyabrouka base reportedly hosts large amounts of Russian tanks and long-range artillery including S-400 surface-to-air missiles and short-range Iskander ballistic missiles that have been used to target northern Ukraine including Kharkiv,” the Telegraph added. That might explain the timing of the attack — a special delivery from Moscow drew an even more special delivery from Kiev.
Attacking Belarus, a country that hasn’t entered the war despite Putin’s desperate need for manpower, would also demonstrate to Moscow that Ukraine and its partners are confident enough in victory to widen the conflict, a message also sent by the attack on Crimea. Ukrainian forces are, uh, really enjoying the psy-op side of all this.
Nationalist Russian media begin to openly attack MoD over “arrogant silence on the tragedy in Crimea”, name the incident a “high-precision attack”. Mainstream non-governmental media richly site this “canary in the coalmine”. Kremlin’s truth monopoly not as intact anymore.
pic.twitter.com/UntXO6f7Yz— Christo Grozev (@christogrozev) August 11, 2022
Unless they want an unpleasantly hot summer break, we advise our valued russian guests not to visit Ukrainian Crimea.
Because no amount of sunscreen will protect them from the hazardous effects of smoking in unauthorised areas.
🎶Bananarama pic.twitter.com/NnWnpZqMhR— Defense of Ukraine (@DefenceU) August 11, 2022
An advisor to Zelensky is also winking publicly at the possibility that the explosions in Belarus weren’t due to a “technical incident”:
The epidemic of technical accidents at military airfields of Crimea and Belarus should be considered by 🇷🇺 military as a warning: forget about Ukraine, take off the uniform and leave. Neither in occupied Crimea nor in occupied Belarus will you feel safe. Karma finds you anywhere.
— Михайло Подоляк (@Podolyak_M) August 11, 2022
So much for the north. Meanwhile in the south, experts are wondering what the Ukrainians are up to by signaling so heavy-handedly that they intend to counterattack in Kherson province and try to retake its namesake city. What’s the strategy there? Theories are circulating:
“If the Ukrainians just wanted to push the Russians out of Kherson, they wouldn’t broadcast what they’re doing,” said John Nagl, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel who is now an associate professor of warfighting studies at the U.S. Army War College. “It looks like the Ukrainians are baiting the Russians, and they’re taking the bait.”…
Western military observers surmise that Ukraine’s strategy is to draw as many Russian troops as possible into Kherson to defend it, cut off their paths of exit and wear them down. The ultimate objective could be to force their surrender.
“If the Ukrainians can trap several companies worth of defenders, that would be the nightmare scenario for the Russians,” said retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Robert Scales…
For Ukraine, [Nagl] said, “The gamble is to capture tens of thousands of Russians in Kherson.” He said success wouldn’t end the war but would buy Ukraine’s president time. “Zelensky needs a big win.”
Maybe the main goal isn’t to retake Kherson but rather to bottle up as many Russian troops as possible in the province and then cut off their means of escape and resupply. Ben Parker notes today that if the estimates of 75,000 Russian casualties are true, not only have they lost *half* of their original invasion force but the entire Russian military of 900,000 men is close to having been decimated in the true sense of that word. “I can’t predict the future, but let me ask you this: Do you think, as the war goes on and the Ukrainians start mounting counterattacks, that the rate of Russian casualties is going to increase, decrease, or stay the same?” Parker wonders. Knowing that their western sponsors won’t be patient forever, the Ukrainians might be going for broke in Kherson by trying to take out a huge chunk of Russia’s remaining forces relatively quickly. If they can surround them and starve them out by damaging bridges and railways, maybe the troops based there will surrender.
And suddenly Putin’s manpower problem will be that much more dire, on top of the added psychological blow of seeing a meaningful segment of his army rolled up.
One more point about the Belarus strike. It’s possible that the explosions last night were caused not by an accident or by Ukraine but by Belarusian saboteurs who are eager to see their dictator, Lukashenko, ousted. Lukashenko faced massive protests a few years ago but managed to cling to power with help from his friend Vladimir and the Russian army. The Russian army isn’t coming to save him this time, though, notes Phillips O’Brien. If Belarusians want the old man gone, now’s their chance.
Looking back now....various things makes one wonder if the advertised levels of troops/equipment that the Russians (for that matter, even the CIA) stated as ‘fact’...were made up for several decades.
Even if you accepted the lesser number of Russian troops dead, the helicopters no longer in active service, and the tanks destroyed...with another six months of war, the Russians would not be a threat to anyone in Europe.
I don’t think Ukraine wants to drag Belarus into its war.
This suggests rebels of Belarus were responsible.
The CCCP fielded about 12 million fighters in 1945.
They did not lack for supplies near and in Berlin.
They’re not able to field 1/10th of the number now.
That was with a total mobilization of their society (in 1941-45), with universal conscription and a call up of all its reserves. The Russian population now is much smaller than that of the USSR in 1941 (146 vs 195 million), and moreover it is much older. More important, the Russian government seems very reluctant to call up its reservists (those conscripts that have completed their service). Granted, it has never practiced calling up the reserves since the days of the USSR, and it doesn’t seem that its system is set up to do that anyway.
I guess it’s pretty hard to fight a limited war against a neighboring country that has access to modern weapons.
It’s time for SloJo to step in and broker a peace, before the mid-terms. That, with his work on climate change, inflation, tax reform, Iranian nuclear progress, defense of Taiwan, border control, Afghan peace, and suppression of white nationalists should assure a Dim victory this fall.
She blowed up real purty!
In addition to all that - they also had a certain industrial superpower supplying them in WW2.
Who cares who’s responsible. The fact is Russia is nearly out of men and material, particularly mobile units and ammunition. Their BCT operations are composed of 1-3 AFVs vs. 12 according to their OOB.
They are basically fixed in place. Next comes encirclement and annihilation. Just like GW1.
The Cyrillic Saddam has learned nothing from his protege’s failures.
“They did not lack for supplies near and in Berlin.”
Because we were the ones supplying much of their needs. They rode into Berlin in American made trucks and jeeps while eating food we gave them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
