[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Oh, I agree. We're likely not going to know what this was all about for quite awhile.

I'm leaning towards this raid being technically legal, but an overreach and political motivated - making a mountain out of something that usually is ignored as a molehill.

[magua]

By not presenting the warrant to the lawyers on the scene is it still technically legal? They botched it up from the get-go. They were going for information and information turned into a panty raid.

[AnthonySoprano]

.
How about something that’s never been been prosecuted before -

And something a FED Raid has never been conducted before for a VP or POTUS?

Just like the firing of the Prosecutor in Ukraine for Cash - Never been done before in History

[Seruzawa]

Every citizen violates at least two federal felonies each and every day. All federal prosecutions are based on someone in the gov’t targeting a citizen for whatever reasons the federal spook has. Maybe some guy just made a pass at the fed’s wife? Or cut him off in traffic? Or didn’t kiss the Fed’s @$$ like the fed wanted? Any of those are enough for some fed freak to persecute someone.

[Starboard]

I’m leaning towards this raid being technically legal, but an overreach and political motivated

*************

By any reasonable standard Garland should have recused himself because of an obvious conflict of interest (i.e., his boss’s future and his job could be derailed by the intended target of the raid.) Maybe technically legal, but also technically unethical.

[kabar]

Technically legal? Until we see the justification in the affidavit, I question the legality. Was the FISA warrant against Carter Page “technically legal”? The DOJ and FBI lie and cheat. We have a track record for them.

https://theintercept.com/2019/12/12/the-inspector-generals-report-on-2016-fb-i-spying-reveals-a-scandal-of-historic-magnitude-not-only-for-the-fbi-but-also-the-u-s-media/