Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If the goons refused to let trumps attorney see it at the time, there’s certainly no guarantee what they release is legitimate. They’ve already been caught fabricating and falsifying evidence.


4 posted on 08/11/2022 12:38:56 PM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wny

In a case like that, Trump’s lawyers cannot vouch for the authenticity of the warrant.


13 posted on 08/11/2022 12:41:45 PM PDT by Ebenezer ("Be strong and of good courage.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: wny

What was probably going on was that the on-scene FBI guys didn’t want Trump’s attorney to see the “basis” of the warrant, which would have been in the attached affidavit. And what Garland said they’re willing to release now still won’t be the basis of the warrant. It’ll just be the warrant itself, stating the address, what they were looking for, etc..


29 posted on 08/11/2022 12:47:21 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: wny

Check post 33, they were given a copy of the warrant.


38 posted on 08/11/2022 12:50:53 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: wny

Exactly.

Trump’s lawyer who rushed to Mar-a-Lago asked to see the warrant and was told no.

She persisted and was finally allowed to see ‘part’ of it.


68 posted on 08/11/2022 1:08:10 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson