Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

“Invading Japan would have cost millions of lives.”
For one thing, this can only be justified using 20/20 hindsight.”

Not to a US military that just wrapped up the incomplete battle of Okinawa. We basically sealed off the northern half of the island and called it a win. It was a horrific battle on the first home island. We knew exactly what would happen invading the rest of Japan. Postwar intelligence confirmed they were right.


52 posted on 08/06/2022 7:32:18 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

So you’re using an “incomplete battle” on a small island to reinforce your idea that invading the main island of Japan was ever a viable option? That makes no sense. If atomic bombs were not an option, do you really think the U.S. ever would have invaded Japan?


60 posted on 08/06/2022 7:39:04 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It's midnight in Manhattan. This is no time to get cute; it's a mad dog's promenade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson