I visited the museum at Hiroshima. The display stated that the US dropped the atomic bombs because they had to justify the enormous costs of the Manhattan Project and as a warning to the Soviets. It never stated the enormous casualties invading mainland Japan would have incurred, both on the US and the Japanese.
For one thing, this can only be justified using 20/20 hindsight. What if the Japan didn’t surrender after the second atomic bomb was dropped? If you keep using them, then you will eventually reach the point where the death toll in the “mass destruction” scenario exceeds your “invasion” scenario estimates anyway.
Secondly … If the estimated casualty count of an invasion is too high, then don’t invade at all. It’s not like Japan was located on the U.S. border and would be a threat to the U.S. indefinitely. Its ability to project military force over long distances had ended long before August of 1945.
My Dad who was in Hiroshima 6 weeks after the bomb told me if they had had to invade those fortified beaches the US would have lost at least 500,000 men.
You should demand a refund
With interest and penalty
Shame on those losers They are lucky Tokyo wasn’t targeted and Hirohito by firing squad
And Japan split like Germany
F them
I've heard some in the West also claim that they've never shown proper contrition for WWII.
There is also a faction of historians that claimed Japan surrendered when they did due to the Soviet Union entering the war against Japan.
The first I totally dismiss. The second was an ancillary benefit.
For all that Japan has accomplished since they surrendered, they have never really fully acknowledged their total destruction and horror they released on Asia and US. Why they still get away with it is beyond me.