Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US-funded breakthrough battery tech that can be infinitely discharged and recharged for as long as 30 years just simply handed over to China due to Licencing Snafu
The Register ^ | 08/04/2022 | Brandon Vigliarolo

Posted on 08/04/2022 8:17:42 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

When US national laboratories develop a new technology, Uncle Sam is supposed to ensure it is commercialized in America. But that's not what happened with what's said to be a breakthrough battery design.

A vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) design created at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has wound up in the hands of a Chinese company, which has since gone on to become the largest manufacturer of VRFBs in the world. The US, which owns the patent and invested $15 million of taxpayer dollars into its development, reportedly has no domestic production site for the novel VRFBs.

That's not to say that VRFBs aren't manufactured in the US – some companies do make them – but the PNNL battery design is different.

Over the course of six years, PNNL scientists developed a special mix of acid and electrolytes that they claim is twice as powerful as other vanadium-based batteries, doesn't degrade like other batteries, and can be infinitely discharged and recharged for as long as 30 years. The refrigerator-sized batteries could be installed in homes hooked up to solar panels and reduce demand on the power grid.

From the lab, straight to the Middle Kingdom

Research on PNNL's VRFB began in 2006, and in 2012 the project's lead scientist, Gary Yang, applied for a license to manufacture and sell the design. The license was granted, leading to the formation of UniEnergy Technologies, which branded the battery ReFlex.

According to NPR, who spoke to Yang for an investigation, UniEnergy was unable to find any US investors. He said they were dissuaded due to the long potential lead times on returns. Yang turned to China, finding a ready investor in a company called Dalian Rongke Power Co, Ltd, located in Dalian, a city on a peninsula in the Yellow Sea between Beijing and South Korea.

By 2017, Yang had granted Rongke a sublicense to manufacture the PNNL VRFBs in China despite his original license specifying that a certain number of batteries had to be sold in the US, which had to be "substantially manufactured" domestically as well, NPR said.

In his interview with NPR, Yang acknowledged he didn't do that, selling few batteries in the US, all of which were made in China. The license was later transferred to a company based in the Netherlands called Vanadis Power that said it plans to manufacture the ReFlex batteries in China and later Germany, with potential future expansion into America.

United States regulations make clear that the transfer of a US government license requires approval from Uncle Sam after officials verify manufacturing isn't moving overseas, and it's here that NPR alleges the Dept of Energy made its biggest mistake: after a couple of emails over the course of an hour and a half, a US government employee transferred the license from UniEnergy to Vanadis.

"Whether the manager or anyone else at the lab or Department of Energy thought to check during that hour and a half or thereafter whether Vanadis Power was an American company, or whether it intended to manufacture in the US, is unclear," NPR reported.

Too little, too late?

The DoE declined to speak comment on the investigation, although a letter the news organization sent to the department with a timeline of events involving Rongke appears to have led to the license being terminated.

"If DoE determines that a contractor who owns a DoE-funded patent or downstream licensee is in violation of its US manufacturing obligations, DoE will explore all legal remedies," the department told NPR.

It's unclear if the DoE's withdrawal of Rongke's license will cause it to stop building the batteries, nor is the status of Vanadis' license clear. The Register has reached out to the government department for clarification.

At this stage, it appears withdrawing the license may have little effect: a blog post by German power company RWE in May said China is readying an 800 MWh lithium-free battery farm in Dalian that uses VRFBs, which is being built by Rongke and another Vanadis partner called Bolong New Materials. Vanadis' website describes Bolong as the exclusive producer of the mixed-acid electrolyte used in ReFlex batteries.

Vanadis continues to assert on its website that it holds exclusive rights to sell the ReFlex battery "in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East." Less clear is whether it has the rights to build and sell VRFBs in Asia, or if the US' withdrawal of a license allowing such will change anything.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battery; china; giveaway; technology; vanadium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 08/04/2022 8:17:42 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

right, screw-em, make them anyway, the chins do it everyday...


2 posted on 08/04/2022 8:19:15 PM PDT by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mark Levin covered this today. Incroyable.


3 posted on 08/04/2022 8:20:19 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Any improvement on a technology, is a new patent. The key to any parent is to be specifically vague; and if you read Dolby Labs on their noise suppression technology, they mastered this method

If you add a new element to the battery, it’s a new technology


4 posted on 08/04/2022 8:25:15 PM PDT by Hodar (A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.- Burroughs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

Chuck Fina.


5 posted on 08/04/2022 8:26:08 PM PDT by KierkegaardMAN (I never engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah, a snafu. A mere accident.

A Joe and Hunter snafu? Joe’s middle name should be snafu.


6 posted on 08/04/2022 8:33:46 PM PDT by TigersEye (The Democrat Party is criminal, unAmerican and illegitimate )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So this is why Nancy went on her trip... Covering up for transferring tech to China.


7 posted on 08/04/2022 8:34:14 PM PDT by jerod (Nazi's were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
the project's lead scientist, Gary Yang... applied for a license...leading to the formation of UniEnergy Technologies...
...UniEnergy was unable to find any US investors. Yang turned to China, finding a ready investor...

Consider me officially skeptical.

From another, more detailed story: "Yang was born in China but is a U.S. citizen and got his Ph.D. at the University of Connecticut."

Here's the link to the more detailed story:

obp.org

8 posted on 08/04/2022 8:38:53 PM PDT by Terabitten (Our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

What is the cost? Tesla batteries have 4x the energy density.

Tesla has been testing a battery that has been ruuning continuous cycles for almost five years with only a 5% loss in capacity.

They are touting it as the 100 year 4 million mile battery.


9 posted on 08/04/2022 8:43:30 PM PDT by TexasGator (ice )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Probably not a mistake.


10 posted on 08/04/2022 8:45:27 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> --- )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Count me as skeptical…right up there with Mr. Fusion.


11 posted on 08/04/2022 8:45:44 PM PDT by jdsteel (Do I really need a /sarc?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“ The Chinese company didn’t steal this technology. It was given to them — by the U.S. Department of Energy. First in 2017, as part of a sublicense, and later, in 2021, as part of a license transfer. An investigation by NPR and the Northwest News Network found the federal agency allowed the technology and jobs to move overseas, violating its own licensing rules while failing to intervene on behalf of U.S. workers in multiple instances.

Now, China has forged ahead, investing millions into the cutting-edge green technology that was supposed to help keep the U.S. and its economy out front.”

From the npr link.


12 posted on 08/04/2022 8:46:11 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jerod

Nutsy went to embolden taiwan and start another war just like kameltoe did with ukraine.


13 posted on 08/04/2022 8:46:32 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A guy named Yang with access to US taxpayer funds for research turns to China for development. 😒 Who coulda guessed? 🙄


14 posted on 08/04/2022 8:48:34 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jerod

Probably should check into the Biden family too


15 posted on 08/04/2022 8:50:40 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Hey, as long as Hunter gets his cut.


16 posted on 08/04/2022 8:52:32 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I think you meant ‘the big guy’...


17 posted on 08/04/2022 9:01:40 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Stupid is as stupid does.


18 posted on 08/04/2022 9:05:49 PM PDT by Boomer ( George Orwell: “During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Riiiiight, “snafu”.
We believe this, honest.


19 posted on 08/04/2022 9:10:59 PM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

10% of that technology, if it pans out, would add up pretty quickly.


20 posted on 08/04/2022 9:13:51 PM PDT by hardspunned (former GOP globalist stooge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson