Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MikeSteelBe
"There is no mention in the Second Amendment about an individual right to own and bear arms. The purpose of the Second Amendment was to placate those former colonies (and soon to be States), who feared the potential of a federal government acting like the King they just overthrew. The bulk of the military that fought the Revolutionary War was state militias (the modern equivalent of which is the National Guard) acting under the command of federal forces."

Bob Reid has been a practicing attorney for over 46 years and has been a resident of Tallahassee since 1989. Reid’s practice has involved, among other matters, both state and federal constitutional issues.

With all do respect, this author is categorically wrong, and is promulgating a narrative born out of the flawed Miller decision that not only is contraindicated in both the history and past legal writings, but in the Heller decision he so casually dimisses. But since the article is written for people not familiar with the history, but relies on the appeal to authority argument, even lefty Lawrence Tribe has cincluded that the right is an individual right.

24 posted on 07/25/2022 7:42:19 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tench_Coxe

“There is no mention in the Second Amendment about an individual right to own and bear arms. “

They ALWAYS get this backwards. ALL rights and freedoms not explicitly laid out in to the Feds in the Constitution are reserved to the States or the People. The People, being made up of individuals, obviously have all rights to keep and bear arms. The 2nd Amendment was merely meant to clarify this point.

They do not want to get this correct. This is intentionally misinterpreting the language.


86 posted on 07/26/2022 2:44:13 AM PDT by Big Giant Head ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Tench_Coxe

Indeed, something about militia, security, free state, right to arms, oh, and “ the people”.

Hard to miss that operative clause.

State, militia are the people.

The problem seems to be a lack of context. In today’s USA, the statist mentality exists, the basic principles of limited government by consent of the governed is a foreign idea.

The rest of the world s systems are mistakenly substituted for our theory of government.


98 posted on 07/26/2022 5:13:50 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson