Skip to comments.
Test case? State's voters to decide on nation's strictest gun control
Weapon purchase would require permit, magazines over 10 rounds banned
wnd.com ^
| 7/21/2022 1949 hrs edt
| wnd news service
Posted on 07/22/2022 8:58:47 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 last
To: simpson96
61
posted on
07/23/2022 5:20:55 AM PDT
by
gundog
( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
To: rktman
Unconstitutional
You do not require a permit from the government to exercise your constitutional rights.
To: gundog
I would,think it would be a constitutional issue
63
posted on
07/23/2022 6:02:16 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: MileHi
Oh, it will stand just fine after the dems have packed the court.
64
posted on
07/23/2022 6:04:17 AM PDT
by
OKSooner
("That was then, this is now." - S.E. Hinton, Tulsa, OK)
To: Bob434
By my reading, it violates the Oregon constitution. I think it would go through there before SCOTUS got a shot at it.
State Right to Bear Arms in Oregon Article 1, Section 27 of the Oregon Constitution states: "The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence [sic] of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power[.]"
65
posted on
07/23/2022 6:12:36 AM PDT
by
gundog
( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
To: gundog
Ah ok- yep, the sc likely won’t hear until the state rules on It first. My thought though is that the right is a national (actually, a world wide right) inalienable right given by God, not by the states. State and federal laws should just verify that right, much like the inalienable right to eat and drink. A govenrment shoukd not be able to set laws thst deny that God given right to self preservation.
66
posted on
07/23/2022 6:26:44 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: Bob434
I hear ya. But it’s a process, here on Earth. And in Oregon, the most secular State in the Union, this move is being led by clergy. This initiative is the tattered remains of what failed to pass in 2020.
2020 Initiatives.
67
posted on
07/23/2022 6:32:28 AM PDT
by
gundog
( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
To: Bob434
68
posted on
07/23/2022 6:36:29 AM PDT
by
gundog
( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
To: gundog
Wow- pretty sad that “faith leaders” want socialist laws like gun laws that deprive individuals of their right to self preservation. Most pastors that I know are for the 2nd amendment. I woild question any so called faith leader who supports repeal of our God given rights to adequate self defence
69
posted on
07/23/2022 7:21:23 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: Bob434
In Oregon, and the Portland area in particular, I generally connect clergy with access to minors. Take that for what it’s worth.
There’s also this crap...Lake Oswego is an Uber-lib wealthy suburb of Portland. This tool of a State Rep’s daughter is one of these kids.
10 point plan for gun control.
70
posted on
07/23/2022 7:30:52 AM PDT
by
gundog
( It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
To: gundog
Yeah there certainly is a high % there that do that. They will answer to God inmthe end, but unfortunately they create a lot of victims which unfortunately is a result of the fallen nature of mankind after he rejected God and ate of the tree he was told not to. Its been evil vs good ever since, and it’s so,hard to keep beleiving In The good when so much evil persists, bUT we must hold onto the good and truth, and resist the evil where we can if society is to stand a chance.
71
posted on
07/23/2022 8:36:49 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: Sir_Ed
I know about Sheriff Hanlan because about 8 or so years ago, the Tea Party of Douglas County paid for him to go to the Constitutional Sheriffs Convention. He went and he has said only a couple of times, he will not enforce un Constitutional gun laws that Salem passes.
The newest one just approved to be on the ballet will restrict all of us from ever purchasing another gun again in this state.
72
posted on
07/23/2022 9:25:33 AM PDT
by
thirst4truth
(America, What difference does it make?)
To: rktman
Democracy is tyranny. The founders knew this.
73
posted on
07/23/2022 1:42:34 PM PDT
by
mrmeyer
(You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Robert Heinlein)
To: MileHi
I don’t see how this can stand if passed given the recent SCOTUS ruling. Have you noticed how many states immediately began to institute policies executive orders emergency powers to subvert the decision. New York has been called down by the Supremes several times, New York just ignores them and passes more laws, rules, lower court decisions....Rinse and repeat.
74
posted on
07/23/2022 6:18:45 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
To: itsahoot
Yes, so now they need to be sued until it hurts.
75
posted on
07/23/2022 6:37:48 PM PDT
by
MileHi
((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: flamberge
"Voters" will decide nothing. Bingo! Secret elections, which mail in elections are can say anything they want them too. Same with voting machines, why anyone thinks they aren't or can't be rigged is beyond me.
76
posted on
07/23/2022 6:40:33 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
To: DownInFlames
Its because these elitists don’t listen or read what the SCOTUS says. They listen and understand, they don't care. no need to worry they just invent reasons to get around the decision and continue with their unconstitutional behavior because there is no penalty for their criminality.
77
posted on
07/23/2022 7:23:55 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
To: from occupied ga
Constitutionally protected rights are not decided by majority votes. Constitutionally protected rights are not protected at all by rogue courts and corrupt politicians.
78
posted on
07/23/2022 7:28:13 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
To: itsahoot
Constitutional rights are protected by the Second Anendment which is of course why tyrants always want to nullify it.
79
posted on
07/23/2022 7:36:57 PM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
To: from occupied ga
Constitutional rights are protected by the Second Anendment which is of course why tyrants always want to nullify it. That was the intention to bad it didn't work.
80
posted on
07/24/2022 5:57:29 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
(Many Republicans are secretly Democrats, no Democrats are secretly Republicans. Dan Bongino.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson