Skip to comments.
Test case? State's voters to decide on nation's strictest gun control
Weapon purchase would require permit, magazines over 10 rounds banned
wnd.com ^
| 7/21/2022 1949 hrs edt
| wnd news service
Posted on 07/22/2022 8:58:47 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
As long as the population centers control the narrative and outnumber rural voters, rural voters will lose. Mrs rktman's solution----on county, one vote. If a measure wins in one county then it gets 1 vote. And reverse. Hey, at least it would make the demokkkommies have to cheat harder out in the boonies.
1
posted on
07/22/2022 8:58:47 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
Unconstitutional. And unlike the “right” to abortion, the constitution is clear: Shall not infringe on the right to bear arms.
2
posted on
07/22/2022 9:01:14 AM PDT
by
Jonny7797
To: Jonny7797
This will not pass Constitutional muster under the Bruen decision.
3
posted on
07/22/2022 9:04:47 AM PDT
by
marktwain
To: rktman
Oregon,,,
Drug sanctuary but
No guns.
I see the Problem.
To: rktman
If anywhere doesn’t need guns, it’s safe, lunatic-free Oregon…
5
posted on
07/22/2022 9:06:18 AM PDT
by
Magnatron
To: marktwain
It will still have to grind through the corrupt judicial system for years ...
6
posted on
07/22/2022 9:06:46 AM PDT
by
NorthMountain
(... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
To: rktman
Yes, an electoral college system for the state.
I don’t see how this can stand if passed given the recent SCOTUS ruling.
7
posted on
07/22/2022 9:07:21 AM PDT
by
MileHi
((Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: rktman
except for current owners, law enforcement and the military. I hear there's a 78 minute waiting period before law enforcement can use its weapons, also.
But only if children are in danger.
8
posted on
07/22/2022 9:08:52 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
To: rktman
Yup. I've begun to think the same: all statewide elections, state and Federal, should be decided by a majority of counties.
I think this is the only way to nullify big city vote fraud by Dems.
9
posted on
07/22/2022 9:09:22 AM PDT
by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
To: rktman
well, as long as the NRA ‘condemns it’... How bout taking it to the SC? fighting it all the way?
10
posted on
07/22/2022 9:09:29 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: rktman
That will boost sales from now to the election!
If I were still a Firearms Manufacturer this would be great news for me until the new unconstitutional infringements took effect.
By then I might have made enough to comfortably retire.
Expect the next vote to be imposing “Ex-Post’Facto” confiscations.
Apparently these lunatics WANT blood!
11
posted on
07/22/2022 9:10:01 AM PDT
by
Ex gun maker.
(Free thinking is now a radical concept, I will not be assimilated by PC or EV groupthink!)
To: rktman
citizens don’t get to decide if they like a constitutional, and more importantly, an inalienable right or not-
12
posted on
07/22/2022 9:11:38 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: Bob434
Well, now they have another excuse to send you two letters a week begging for more money.
13
posted on
07/22/2022 9:13:42 AM PDT
by
Repeat Offender
(While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy saints surrounded.)
To: rktman
Will they start kicking in doors to confiscate the ‘illegal’ weapons?
14
posted on
07/22/2022 9:14:53 AM PDT
by
dynachrome
(“We cannot save Ukraine by dooming the US economy.” Rand Paul)
To: rktman
"Voters" will decide nothing.
The people on the Democrat Party State Committee who write up the "election results" will decide what happens to this legislation. And the US Constitution will not restrain them.
15
posted on
07/22/2022 9:17:37 AM PDT
by
flamberge
(Those who pose the greatest danger to you are living within five miles of you.)
To: rktman
Stupid... But I’m also getting really sick of law enforcement and military exemptions. Its time they be treated equally.
Man, Gottlieb’s SAF lawsuits will be flying!
Think I’ll send them a few more bucks for the cause...
17
posted on
07/22/2022 9:23:42 AM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
("Okay. As long as the paperwork is clean, you boys can do what you like out there." -Fifi)
To: pierrem15
I agree, but don’t see how such laws could ever be passed because of the existing big-city population imbalances. Such a law would have to be in effect already to have a chance at passage.
To: dynachrome
Will they start kicking in doors to confiscate the ‘illegal’ weapons? Maybe in one or two high-profile cases, "pour encourager les autres". And they will have reporters standing by to film the drama.
For the high volumes they expect later, they will just levy huge unpayable fines, shut off your bank accounts, get you fired, and reduce you and your family to destitution. You can appeal, but the legal fees will bankrupt you even if you "win".
I do not believe this conflict will solved in the courts or by elections. It may not go as well as the sponsors hope either. The opposition always has a say in the outcome.
19
posted on
07/22/2022 9:27:16 AM PDT
by
flamberge
(Those who pose the greatest danger to you are living within five miles of you.)
To: Ex gun maker.
IIRC a while back we discusse the amount of +10 magazine sales in Oregon. Or maybe it was Washington. In either case, it looks like millons of +10 mags will grandfathered in.
20
posted on
07/22/2022 9:36:04 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson