The devils we know are far worse than those we don’t in this case. Not rooting for Putin to take over the world, but i seriously DGAF about Ukraine. Not our problem.

Oh thank you

A rational opinion picec in a sea of silliness

Putin’s actions vis-a-vis the Orthodox church is state-politcally designed to engender the institutional church support for Putin and the state, and nothing to do with “christian values”, which as an assaassin do not exist in Putin. But many in the American “right” fall for it anyway.

The devils we don’t know can and most often are far worse than the ones we know. Communist takeover of Russia proves that

Anything pedo pos joe is for I am against.

Anything commie traitor poopy pants is against I am for.

F*** Joe Biden.

This author sees a connection between birth control and homosexuality, so maybe one shouldn't take him too seriously

Birth Control and Homosexuality: Unintended Consequences

2 years ago

Add Comment

by Mike Konrad

110 Views

Written by Mike Konrad

In the 1980s, I had a boss who had gotten a masters degree in psychology from New York University. He was a brilliant man; could have been a doctor. He told me a story that explains much of what we see in society today.

It seems that while doing his graduate work in the early 1960s, he had to do research on lab rats, which were given the synthetic hormones used in the then new birth control pills. The results, he told me, showed that the grandchildren of these lab rats would have high rates of homosexual behaviors. From what he told me, the findings were suppressed. Apparently, the powers that be wanted “the pill” to pass muster. What happened to the second generation of rats that followed was of no consequence to them.

Then my boss told me: The first generation of kids born to mothers using the pill have already arrived. But we should expect in another generation a noticeable increase in homosexual behavior, as they would be the second generation. As that was then still in the future, I was shocked.

This was told me in the mid ’80s. By his reckoning, we should have seen a societal explosion of homosexuality starting around 2000, and subsequently. And, of course, we have seen such an explosion. His prediction came true.

Now, to many classic conservatives – whether religious or merely social – homosexuality is a choice, something which can be learned and/or unlearned. The problem is: There is a degree of evidence that it may be contrariwise in some individuals.

I invite one to look at this short CBS 60 Minutes documentary about what happens to lab rats treated with sex hormones early on their development. There is a body of evidence that early hormonal manipulation can have horrific consequences.

We have to ask ourselves, what happens to all those women using hormonal contraceptives when they stop their pills in anticipation of wanted pregnancy. Does the normal human cycle return immediately, or is there a rebound effect where, even if ovulation occurs, the ambient hormonal background in the womb is screwed up? This article addressed the question of whether gonadal steroid exposure during prenatal development is one of the factors, in at least one of the pathways, that lead to variability in sexual orientation outcomes. Based on the compelling evidence that prenatal testosterone exposure influences children’s sex-typical play behavior, on the well-established links between childhood play interests and adult sexual orientation, and on the evidence showing altered sexual orientation in women exposed to high levels of androgens prenatally, because of CAH, the answer appears to be “yes.”National Institutes of Health

This next quote seems to confirm what my boss told me that the effect will skip a generation to the grandchildren.

There is no meritorious reason to back Russia or the Ukraine. America must make the choice based solely on its own self interests. What is really disturbing is the fact that there are some people who believe that the Ukraine is worth risking a nuclear war for. And believing that could never happen is thinking worthy of Neville Chamberlain, or like the senator who predicted that all of the blood spilled in the Civil War could be wiped up with a pocket hankie.

Every Trump-hating and MAGA-hating bluecheck POS on the Twittsewer is ALL IN for The pUkeraine project.

When I see that those foetid piles of rotting dogsqueezins are FOR something, I'm automatically agin it.

While there may be some who are partial to Russia and against Ukraine because of Globohomo, the vast majority of us are just against this war for the same reason Trump didn’t want it - it’s extremely costly and unlikely to lead to a positive result, and would wind up similar to our misadventures in Iraq and Afghanistan.

What nonsense

Strait off CIA’s Mockingbird fax machine.

Interesting.

Our stance when two terrible nations are warring ought to be to stand back and watch.

Agreed. We don't have a dog in this fight. They can kill each other and go to the devil for all I care. The Ukraine has been corrupt as hell since its inception as a republic. The United States has no business giving them a single dime or a single bullet.

More of this mutually exclusive thinking. Not supporting a corrupt Ukraine, is not the same as supporting Putin. Basically, two corrupt crime syndicates fighting it out.

Strait off CIA’s Mockingbird fax machine

ding, ding, ding..

This is the most pathetic pro-Soros and Biden propaganda piece I have ever seen

That seems to be what some people are missing: just because one doesn’t want to push America’s resources into another foreign war does not make one “pro-Putin” or “pro-Russia”.

It simply means that getting involved in yet another Slavic conflict is not within our national interest.

(And given the Leftist wokescolds who currently run our military in the White House and the Pentagon, I wouldn’t trust them to launch any sort of military op without it turning into an unmitigated disaster.)