1 posted on
07/18/2022 12:48:03 PM PDT by
Morgana
To: Morgana
Judges ???? Running the country now and defying Supreme Court again?????
2 posted on
07/18/2022 12:52:30 PM PDT by
caww
(O death, when you seized my Lord, you lost your grip on me......Augustine)
To: Morgana
I can’t find the judge’s name in the article. Seems like that would be a basic element of the story, but maybe my eyes are just tired.
3 posted on
07/18/2022 12:55:23 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: Morgana
“The ACLU contends that every day the law remains enforceable those who are pregnant are forced to have their own abortions, travel out of state or remain pregnant against their will.”
And other laws force pedophiles to have to travel out of country to Thailand. So what?
5 posted on
07/18/2022 12:58:20 PM PDT by
Seruzawa
("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
To: Morgana
At what point do we take up pitchforks?
12 posted on
07/18/2022 1:20:51 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Unbelief has nothing to say. Chance favors the prepared mind.)
To: Morgana
Hard to tell from the story, but it looks like the state AG is claiming the 1800s ban was never repealed, while the ACLU says more recent and more lenient statutes held in abeyance like the 20 week ban are now in effect.
Sounds like a there is a genuine legal question if the 20 week ban was passed recently but not enforced until now.
In the end, the legislature will probably act quickly to put the 1800s ban back into effect.
13 posted on
07/18/2022 1:21:54 PM PDT by
pierrem15
("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
To: Morgana
Will be quickly reversed.
14 posted on
07/18/2022 1:43:20 PM PDT by
cowboyusa
(America Cowboy up!)
To: Morgana
This is not much help without the judge being identified for those who will go to vote against him or her.
To: Morgana
More BS. Fake news. I’m sure they updated the laws since 1800.
They will lie with impunity.
18 posted on
07/18/2022 2:54:38 PM PDT by
Fledermaus
(With Trans Republicans like McCarthy and McConnell do we really want them to win Congress in 2022?)
To: Morgana
If judges had 100 years to block this law, why do it now?
Why don't judges have to address the same ripeness tests they impose on people bringing the cases?
The time to challenge these laws was when they were passed, or better, when they were being debate and legislated. It's too late to wait decades before trying to block it.
-PJ
19 posted on
07/18/2022 3:00:11 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
To: Morgana
I don’t think either side likes the way little judges can thwart an action, and other refresh it, and the next one blocks it and the legislature adjourns without settling it.
But the old solution “it’s going to have to go to the SCOTUS” doesn’t seem to work. The leftists then stage a rally, dox the judges, surround their homes and everything is overruled again.
What a country.
20 posted on
07/18/2022 3:27:47 PM PDT by
frank ballenger
(You have summoned up a thundercloud. You're gonna hear from me. Anthem by Leonard Cohen)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson