This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
Posted on 07/14/2022 10:52:43 PM PDT by RandFan
@asholiver
NEW: @HouseJudiciary Democrats are expected to hold a markup next week to move legislation to ban “assault weapons”
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
What are they really gunning for?
They really want civil war.
DOA at the SCOTUS...
since the vast majority are used for self defense
shouldnt they be called self defense weapons
you know like mostly peaceful?
Ironic, isn’t it, how local leftist leniency caused the mass murders which leftists are now using as an excuse to disarm law abiding citizens?
That was the plan all along. Soros not z tactics in full bloom and the vast majority do not see it because they just can’t accept that this could happen in these United States. People are, by and large, stupid and cowed....not to mention the few who do see it are mostly too whatever(pick your excuse) to actually do anything about it outside of expending a lot of hot air. Even if one tries they’re up against the powers that be and are slowly but surely crushed for daring to challenge them. This is real life folks. The larger question is what are YOU going to do about it?
“Well ordered” means well armed. Discouraged ownership of firearms by excessive taxation is unconstitutional.
FMCDH
Shall not be infringed.
What’s a markup? I don’t think the constitution mentions this practice.
Yep...in 2033.
The last time they did that proved it to have no affect. So they rescinded it later. Congress Critters are UN-Constitutional, forgetful and stupid.
And it lost them Congress at the next election.
They are looking to start something that they can’t finish.
This Ping List is for all things pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
No, the last time they did it, it had a sunset clause. They probably wouldn’t be that stupid s second time
I find myself wishing there were a mechanism whereby the SCOTUS could
just step in and strike unconstitutional things down.
It is an internal House process (rule) to allow changes to proposed legislation.
I seem to remember that at one point it time, there was a proposal to require SCOTUS comment on proposed legislation while in draft. SCOTUS rejected the idea as it would bog the court down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.