UK Grooming Gang Victim Testifies in Media, Police Ambush and Intimidate Her At Home (Video)

“Their [Police] attitude was intimidatory and I was made to feel like I was under investigation, when they should be focusing on the criminals preying on young girls in Telford” – Samantha Smith

On July 5, 2022, Samantha Smith, a victim of grooming in Telford, England, joined Mark Steyn to discuss a report set to be published this month on grooming gangs in Telford. Smith, who was sexually abused from age 5 to 14, condemned the egregious handling of the child sexual exploitation scandal, which destroyed the lives of countless young girls. Two days after Steyn interviewed Smith for GB News, police harassed and intimidated Smith at her home, demanding she speak to them about her interview.

Smith took to Twitter to report what happened following her interview with Steyn:

Ms. Smith was sexually abused for almost a decade by various men across Telford. She continued by stating: “These are not crimes of the past. These are not things which have gone away.”

“Young girls are being left at the mercy of grooming gangs” The scandal began in the 1980s, when predatory abusers, mainly Muslim migrants, began targeting vulnerable girls in Telford and picking them upon on the streets and outside a children’s home.

Telford has a population of 157,000, yet it has the UK’s highest recorded rate of child sex crimes.

Ms. Smith outlined horrific figures which revealed how “18.4 children per 10,000 in Telford against a National rating of 7.9” were subject to child sexual exploitation.

Victims of child abuse in the UK, specifically Telford, have struggled to get justice. Ms. Smith explained how Police officers probed her on whether she “asked for consent.” Thousands of the victims have been denied compensation or health and social assistance, and there have been no prosecutions of culpable officials.

For years, so many in authority knew the scale and severity of the crimes being perpetrated against young British girls but did nothing to stop it. Instead of arresting rapists, officers went to great lengths to hide the grooming gang epidemic. Police often targeted people trying to rescue their children. Furthermore, anyone reporting on the Islamic migrant grooming gang epidemic was often harassed and intimidated by the state.

Rather than taking steps to protect British children, police, social workers, teachers, neighbors, politicians, and the media deliberately downplayed the severity of the crimes perpetrated by the grooming gangs to avoid being accused of “Islamophobia” or racism.

Agencies responsible for child-protection have almost entirely failed in their job to protect vulnerable children. From a fear of being called ‘racist,’ police forces across the country have buried the evidence…. Political correctness would be used to make sure that people did not speak about this phenomenon. — from Easy Meat: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery

Sadly, after all these decades of failing young victims of sexual abuse, police are still spending their time intimidating and hunting down a victim of grooming gangs instead of, as Samantha Smith states, “the criminals preying on young girls in Telford.”

Perhaps the British people could save themselves from their massive futility of thought and purpose if they would acknowledge the full set of facts of their founding, ruling class’ extremely bloody history, unparalleled in human history, going back to the 1500s. Though the following examples may seem remote from the Rotherham debacle, they are probably actually, directly related to the extreme Islamophobia-phobia that has allowed the Rotherham debacle to persist for a generation. There would be Winston Churchill’s racist handling of the 1920s Bengal famine, allowing 2.3 million Indians, whom he despised with racist terminology, to starve, to support the Australian wheat market. But this was only the latest such incident in Bengal; a famine in the 1700s perpetuated by the British East India, Royal Charter Company, actually influenced the American Colonists to rebel. Then in the 1800s, a three-way, related set of British ruling class, international financial market exploitation of labor, persisted between the workers of England, starving peasants in Ireland, and African slaves in North America: It seems the issue was that Black slave families had “useless eaters” among their elders who continued to live after they were no longer able to work. So William Cobbett criticized the bleeding heart of William Wilberforce, who was not economically disinterested in the suppression of the African portion of the labor exploitation of workers; meanwhile English workers were being subjected to 18 hour work shifts in mills and mines; and Irish peasants were being starved while there were bumper crops of Irish agricultural exports to England, guarded by soldiery under the British largely manned by Irish recruits, so that they won’t talk about it to this day. The centuries long guilt trip that results in the Rotherham mismanagement stems from bloody social and foreign colonial ethnic exploitation going back centuries, starting domestically with the despoliation of English monasteries with their centuries of labor value accumulation afforded by the monks working for free (evangelical counsel of poverty), and throwing English peasants off their common lands in Enclosure of open lands, under the proto-capitalists behind the Tudors, such as William Cecil, Lord Burghley. The British upper elite, symbolized by the House of Windsor, have yet to own up to their bloody colonial history, so naturally they have to project it onto the poor young women of Rotherham.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.