Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

Well, SCOTUS certainly did that with respect to carbon emissions, but Butt-Head is trying to ideologically restrict or close the Permian Basin based on ozone pollution, which is a long-established regulatory function of the federal government. I’m not sure the SCOTUS ruling applies to that one.


12 posted on 06/30/2022 7:49:05 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Bus No. 2525)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the mention.


24 posted on 06/30/2022 8:13:34 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

“but Butt-Head is trying to ideologically restrict or close the Permian Basin based on ozone pollution, which is a long-established regulatory function of the federal government.”

It may be long-established, but is it legal? The eco-fascist regulatory agencies are well-known for making sh*t up that exceed congressional rule-making authority. Besides, it’s illegal for agencies to write law. Only congress may pass legislation.


64 posted on 07/01/2022 8:14:00 AM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson