Yeah, like I stated. Winner take all is great if your candidate slides by with a 51% tally.
What I was trying to say was the article was hyperventilating about legislatures being able to change how they choose electors.
It was silly because they have ALWAYS been able to change how electors are chosen and occasionally they do. The court case won’t change that at all.
What it might tamp down on, is judges interfering with legislatures over everything and anything.