If and it’s a big IF there is ever a solution to the southern border and immigration, it must come from the legislature and signed into law by the President.
Starting with Obama, executive orders to effect immigration have gone back and forth, Obama and Biden want no border, Trump wanted a closed border.
Basically, if one administration issues and executive order, another administration should be able to rescind it.
Based on my limited understanding of this case, the court ruled, Biden had the power to reverse an executive order Trump issued.
Overall, conservatives have to be happy with the outcomes.
Basically, if one administration issues and executive order, another administration should be able to rescind it.
+++++
Thank you. I think you are correct. And, if so, the ruling was also correct. I really don’t want some screwy Biden EO hanging around after Trump is re-elected.
Duh ... executive orders are, and should be "easy come, easy go".
This is an example of a Constitutionally correct decision which has an effect we don't like.
> if one administration issues and executive order, another administration should be able to rescind it <
This is a disappointing ruling. But you’re right.
The root problem is that presidents have exercised too much power with executive orders. Presidents are supposed to carry out Congress’s wishes. Issuing executive orders is one way to do that.
Presidents are not supposed to use executive orders to make their own policies.
While I agree with you, I would like to see what Thomas and the dissent wrote.
That’s how I read it as well - new admin can undo what previous admin did if it’s an EO. Always been that way.
Bigger question that wasn’t asked or addressed is whether the FED Govt is performing it’s duty in executing the laws on the books and defending the States from invasion.
But strangely, Trump was not allowed to end the o’Bungle “Dreamer” nonsense.
If the rules are not consistent they are not rules at all.