Posted on 06/29/2022 2:44:27 PM PDT by Magnatron
Cassidy Hutchinson, an aide to former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, released a new statement Wednesday provided exclusively to CNN standing by her blockbuster testimony revealed in a hearing with the House select committee investigating January 6, in light of some pushback on her testimony.
“Ms. Hutchinson stands by all of the testimony she provided yesterday, under oath, to the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol,” Hutchinson’s counsel Jody Hunt and William Jordan said in the statement.
Hutchinson testified for nearly two hours on Tuesday as well as giving recorded depositions in advance of the hearing, where she vividly described her experience at the White House close to Meadows and then-President Donald Trump during the days leading up to and including the Capitol Hill riot. Hutchinson described how Trump and Meadows had been repeatedly warned in advance and on the day of the attack about the possibility of violence including from armed individuals at the rally.
While officials with the Secret Service as well as close to Trump have not disputed the overall characterization of Hutchinson’s testimony, some are rebutting specific claims and descriptions.
Unlike Hutchinson’s testimony, the limited denials were not made under oath.
-snip-
The Secret Service, through the Department of Homeland Security Office of Legislative Affairs, notified the committee Tuesday afternoon that it will make the agents involved available to testify under oath, the official said, and that the agents are prepared to say under oath that the incident Hutchinson described did not occur.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Well done Cassidy. I’m sure your reputation destruction was worth it…
This b!tch is about payback to Trump for SCOTUS on abortion.
Another “Pound MeToo” liar.
Of course, they put the most important paragraph at the very end.
This b!tch is about payback to Trump for SCOTUS on abortion.
—
This!
Is she sure it wasn’t Trump with her making out in the basement 20 years ago?
“While officials with the Secret Service as well as close to Trump have not disputed the overall characterization of Hutchinson’s testimony, some are rebutting specific claims and descriptions. Unlike Hutchinson’s testimony, the limited denials were not made under oath.”
I guess it depends on how one defines what “overall characterization” and “limited denials” mean. :-)
What does it matter to stick by testimony of something you didn’t witness happening?
While officials with the Secret Service as well as close to Trump have not disputed the overall characterization of Hutchinson’s testimony, some are rebutting specific claims and descriptions.
Weasel word decoder
We wont come out and call you a liar outright.... But you are full of ....... fill in the blanks...
Yeah, so does Amber Heard.
I wonder why no one has asked her where President Trump was seated in the vehicle.
And where are the videos that confirm his seat?
The press is snapping stills and taking video of his every move, so there must be photo evidence of where he was seated.
The press is totally inept.
Exactly. "I stand by my hearsay, dammit!"
unfortunately, this is a he said/she said deal. The he is going to have to prove the she is another Amber Heard.
I doubt there is a recording
While she didn’t witness anything...
The story about Trump and the SS is that they wanted to keep him from the Capitol because armed individuals in the crowd might assassinate HIM.
And that Trump said they’re not here to hurt me. Probably a logical but still risky assumption.
So that gets turned into he knew about an armed threat but did nothing about it.
They were warning him if a threat to HIM.
AND there was no armed action at the Capitol, so they’re doing he had advance knowledge of something that never happened.
AND he offered the Capitol thousands of troops, so how on earth could that be “did nothing about it”.
.
What choice does she have?
She’s a hero on Twitter
.
They are sure creative. I give them that.
Normal people would say there are other witnesses that disagree with the testimony etc. That is exactly how these same people would characterize it if the target was a democrat.
It’s not “she said” because she didn’t witness any of it.
“CNN FAKE NEWS AND PERVERT FACTORY” LOL thanks for giving me my only smile of the day!! 👍🤝
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.