Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LIConFem

already confirmed....is this a first? (replacement confirmed prior to resignation) As far as I know it is.

If Breyer had not resigned (and say died under the next President) would the confirmation still be valid?


8 posted on 06/29/2022 9:29:31 AM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: scrabblehack

He already resigned, his replacement has been confirmed, this just finalizes the effective date. I assume he wanted to make sure all pending decisions were released before he finalized the date.


17 posted on 06/29/2022 9:35:12 AM PDT by GreenLanternCorps (Hi! I'm the Dread Pirate Roberts! (TM) Atsk about franchise opportunities in your area.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: scrabblehack

Not a first.

For example, O’Connor announced her retirement on July 1, but noted that it wouldn’t be effective until the nomination and confirmation of a successor.

Alito thus joined the Court mid-term.


19 posted on 06/29/2022 9:37:59 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: scrabblehack

“is this a first? (replacement confirmed prior to resignation)”

I don’t know, but I’m sure they did it this way to avoid another fiasco like when Ginsburg wouldn’t retire and Trump ended up getting to nominate her successor.


23 posted on 06/29/2022 9:42:44 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: scrabblehack

It has been common for a Justice to submit his intention to retire with the actual date ‘pending confirmation of a successor’.

It has happened more often in the last century simply because people are living longer.


34 posted on 06/29/2022 10:00:51 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: scrabblehack
already confirmed....is this a first? (replacement confirmed prior to resignation) As far as I know it is.

If Breyer had not resigned (and say died under the next President) would the confirmation still be valid?

Yes it is a first, and unconstitutional in my opinion, since the Senate confirmed a nominee for a position that wasn't vacant at the time of confirmation.

And if it is constitutional, then when the Republicans get the Senate and the White House, they should line up replacements for EVERY SINGLE JUSTICE and confirm them immediately. Hell, line up 20 candidates for the next 20 SCOTUS vacancies.

40 posted on 06/29/2022 10:09:15 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /Sarc tag really necessary? Pray for President Biden: Psalm 109:8 Test: 9.8 m/s²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: scrabblehack

If Breyer had not resigned (and say died under the next President) would the confirmation still be valid?

I would think not as a succeeding president can not be bound by a prior president’s nomination when the nominee is not sworn in.


49 posted on 06/29/2022 10:17:25 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: scrabblehack

>>If Breyer had not resigned (and say died under the next President) would the confirmation still be valid?<<

A case could be made that, after the mid-terms, if the Senate changed hands, that the new Senate could rescind the confirmation. This may be the reason for the timing. The Supreme court just finished their 2021-22 term.


77 posted on 06/29/2022 11:58:52 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson