Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats unveiling ‘Transgender Bill of Rights’
The Hill ^ | 06/28/22 7:12 PM ET | BY ZACH SCHONFELD

Posted on 06/28/2022 5:14:11 PM PDT by RandFan

A group of House Democrats on Tuesday announced they would move to codify federal protections for transgender people.

The proposal, dubbed the “Transgender Bill of Rights,” would codify the Supreme Court’s 2020 Bostock v. Clayton County decision that protects employees against discrimination for being gay or transgender.

The proposal would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to explicitly include protections for gender identity and sex characteristics, expand access to gender-affirming care and ban conversion therapy.

It would also require the attorney general to designate a liaison dedicated to overseeing enforcement of civil rights for transgender people and invest in community services to prevent anti-transgender violence.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and co-chair of the Transgender Equality Task Force, said in a statement that the resolution would ensure transgender people can lead “full, happy lives.”

“As we witness Republicans and an extremist Supreme Court attack and roll back the fundamental rights of trans people across our country, and as state legislatures across the country target our trans community with hateful, bigoted and transphobic attacks, we are standing up and saying enough is enough,” Jayapal said.

Jayapal introduced the proposal alongside Reps. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), Marie Newman (D-Ill.), Mark Takano (D-Calif.) and Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.). The bill has 84 other co-sponsors.

The bill’s proponents cited Friday’s Supreme Court decision overturning the constitutional right to an abortion.

Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that the court should also consider overturning some of its other precedents decided under the same substantive due process protections at the heart of Friday’s decision, like rights to same-sex marriage and contraception.

The Bostock decision was not mentioned in Thomas’s concurring opinion and involved a different legal question.

But Thomas’s opinion has caught the eye of many Democrats who believe the Supreme Court’s conservative majority is poised to roll back rights extended to LGBTQ people in past cases.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Illinois; US: New York; US: Rhode Island; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: california; chat; chatforum; clarencethomas; claytoncounty; davidcicilline; degeneratecaucus; deviancy; genderdysphoria; homofascism; homosexualagenda; illinois; marienewman; marktakano; pramilajayapal; rhodeisland; ritchietorres; transgenders; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2022 5:14:11 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

This is what these ding dongs waste their time doing while President Retard screws up the country 🤪


2 posted on 06/28/2022 5:15:45 PM PDT by NWFree (Somebody has to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Mental illness is not a “right”, it’s a disease.


3 posted on 06/28/2022 5:16:12 PM PDT by datura (Eventually, the Lord and the Truth will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Shouldn’t this be the Transgender Betty of Rights?


4 posted on 06/28/2022 5:16:50 PM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

This is sure to be a crowd-pleaser.

Remember when Republicans were constantly being warned not to “give in to extremes” because it would “alienate moderate voters” ?


5 posted on 06/28/2022 5:17:37 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NWFree

Economic disaster looming, globalists looking to start WWIII, our border being overrun, and then this is the priority.


6 posted on 06/28/2022 5:17:54 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

The right to keep a bare ass shall not be infringed.


7 posted on 06/28/2022 5:19:02 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

How about a “say gay” bill?

When a man says he’s a woman, we tell him, “no, you are gay”.


8 posted on 06/28/2022 5:19:18 PM PDT by UNGN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Rats aim to destroy the family fabric.


9 posted on 06/28/2022 5:19:44 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

IMO they keep pushing the Trans crap to move the Overton window and in the process make gays and gay marriage seem “normal” by comparison


10 posted on 06/28/2022 5:19:55 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Go for it! Double down on the craziness, November is coming up.


11 posted on 06/28/2022 5:21:14 PM PDT by Alvin Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

No - no more carving out groups for political leveraging.

Revoke the civil rights act outright.

Punch a communist.


12 posted on 06/28/2022 5:21:35 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
Democrats, please, please, please keep pushing this crap. They will lose a majority of the black and latino vote. They may even lose homosexual men. A lot of gays don’t like trans, they see trans as competition or for the freaks they are. Imagine that, freaks calling others freaks. It’s almost funny.

Meanwhile, most Americans care about inflation, gas prices, crime and the southern border invasion.

13 posted on 06/28/2022 5:21:52 PM PDT by ConservativeInPA (Scratch a leftist and you'll find a fascist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

“Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that the court should also consider overturning some of its other precedents decided under the same substantive due process protections at the heart of Friday’s decision, like rights to same-sex marriage and contraception.”

Substantive Due Process is a blank check to legislate from the bench.


14 posted on 06/28/2022 5:22:47 PM PDT by cdcdawg (Hoes mad! LOL! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Only a Satanist nation would do such a thing. Better hope it doesn’t happen.


15 posted on 06/28/2022 5:24:14 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

My first thought was “There’s an election loser.”
All the transgender people are going to vote for the democrats anyway, but I’d expect a few of the church ladies are democrats but can’t stomach this agenda.


16 posted on 06/28/2022 5:25:14 PM PDT by conejo99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Here’s a question: would this bill accomplish anything other than create more bureaucracy?

Will anyone at all be better off as a result of this?


17 posted on 06/28/2022 5:26:08 PM PDT by cockroach_magoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

While at the same time they are destroying the “Bill Of Rights” for normal, sane and decent people.


18 posted on 06/28/2022 5:27:42 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura
Mental illness is not a “right”, it’s a disease.

I would say it's a spiritual disease, Satan is working full time and so far winning the souls of godless Americans.

19 posted on 06/28/2022 5:27:44 PM PDT by PROCON (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

What is a woman? If they can’t answer that simple question they have no business dictating anything to anyone.


20 posted on 06/28/2022 5:28:03 PM PDT by Boomer (Piss On A Bolshevik Marxist commie For Mommy! Warning! The Gateway Pundit Bans and Censors Patriots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson