Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pfizer, CDC lied to Americans, FDA-approved COVID shot exists on paper only
Natural Health 365 ^ | June 24, 2022 | Sara Middleton

Posted on 06/27/2022 9:20:40 PM PDT by SecAmndmt

(...)

FDA-approved COVID shots exist only on paper, Pfizer and CDC openly admit that “approved” version of the shot will “not be manufactured or made available”

(...)

(Excerpt) Read more at naturalhealth365.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigpharma; clickbaitadspam; clotshot; clueless365; conspiracyrepublic; covid; covid19; fraud; karenrepublic; mengeleshot; notanewsarticle; notanewssite; pfizer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: heavy metal

heavy metal wrote: “angels don’t get wings from your constant lying...”

Of course not, they get their wings when you call me a liar.


81 posted on 06/29/2022 12:11:04 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

Worldtraveler once upon a time wrote: “The “official” data from Johns Hopkins and US Census tell that the mortality rate of the whole “event” (which frames your diligent responses to many on this thread) is a meager 0.08 percent after about two and a half years. Survival rate? 99.92% worldwide with and without being “fully vaccinated.””

The survival rate from polio was about 99.9% too.

Worldtraveler once upon a time wrote: “One notes your many posts to this one thread. Busy comrade, but not very “effective.” Rather like the mRNA injections and boosters, given that Fauci has tested positivitve then negative then positive again. “Fully effective” now means getting Covid, comrade.”
The vaccines were very effective:

COVID-19 vaccines saved an estimated 20 million lives in 1 year

COVID vaccines reduced the potential global death toll during the pandemic by almost two-thirds in their first year, saving an estimated 19.8 million lives, according to a mathematical modeling study yesterday in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

An additional 600,000 lives could have been spared if a World Health Organization (WHO) goal of vaccinating 40% of the population of every country by the end of 2021 had been met, the authors of the study say.

Vaccination cut deaths an estimated 63%
To estimate the impact of vaccination worldwide, researchers from Imperial College London used a proven model of COVID-19 spread using country-level data for official COVID deaths that occurred from Dec 8, 2020—when vaccines were first rolled out—to Dec 8, 2021. They conducted a separate analysis of expected excess deaths to account for under-reporting of COVID-19 deaths during the study period.

https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2022/06/covid-19-vaccines-saved-estimated-20-million-lives-1-year


82 posted on 06/29/2022 12:16:36 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

you get another step closer to hell with every lie you tell...


83 posted on 06/29/2022 12:38:30 PM PDT by heavy metal (smiling improves your face value and makes people wonder what the hell you're up to... 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
"...estimated." "Potential." "Mathematical modeling." "Imperial College London" which brought us the initial 2.2 million deaths estimate by Ferguson in the first moments of the pandemic.

"Such overestimations remind us of several lessons learned over the course of the pandemic.," in "Revisiting the initial COVID-19 pandemic projections"

Source: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanmic/article/PIIS2666-5247(21)00029-X/fulltext

Lovely that you are trying so hard. "We estimated." Proof positive "findings" that that "we estimated."

By the way, the 23 June 2022 article article is funded, as it says, by "Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust; WHO; UK Medical Research Council; Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; National Institute for Health Research; and Community Jameel."

Translation: "...most pick the expert who says the things they agree with."

You agree with Gates, GAVI, the WHO and such experts. Clear.

84 posted on 06/29/2022 2:17:39 PM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Worldtraveler once upon a time

Worldtraveler once upon a time wrote: “You agree with Gates, GAVI, the WHO and such experts. Clear.”

Do you believe the COVID and the vaccines are just a big conspiracy to depopulate the world?


85 posted on 06/29/2022 2:24:15 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

you don’t have answers you have accusations...


86 posted on 06/29/2022 2:28:13 PM PDT by heavy metal (smiling improves your face value and makes people wonder what the hell you're up to... 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
--- "Do you believe the COVID and the vaccines are just a big conspiracy to depopulate the world?"

What a silly formulation to the question. Belief is a different mental module from knowledge. Cognitive science puts them on opposite sides of a range of propositions, from least supported to most supported. You ask about the least supported, which all beliefs including yours share.

You believe that which you post, because your continued discussion in this evidences a conviction that estimations and mathematical modeling are knowledge, whereas by their very nature they are less supported on such a scale.

As to the effects as being shown in the VAERS and complimentary European systems for injury reporting, both passive systems, indicate injury which seems of little interest to the GAVI folks and perhaps you too, I believe, the question cannot be as you formulate. Yours was another version of "have you stopped beating your wife."

There are more than two options, total acceptance of the mRNA science and its application and politics, versus your "conspiracy theory" debate choice.

Time will tell. What is certain so far is that there are significant injuries related to the mRNA products. Or do you KNOW there are none?

https://komonews.com/news/coronavirus/we-do-exist-some-americans-suffer-life-changing-covid-vaccine-injuries

https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2021/11/04/feds-pay-zero-claims-for-covid-19-vaccine-injuriesdeaths/?sh=2254b5674a87

https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2021-08-17/severe-covid-vaccine-injuries-help-federal-vaccine-court

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/more-than-10-000-australians-have-filed-coronavirus-vaccine-injury-claims-20211115-p598yy.html

You agree with Gates, GAVI, the WHO and such experts. Clear. You disagree with those who disagree. It is a belief that you are as informed as you are, and that someone who disagrees with you is as uninformed as you BELIEVE he is.

I made no depopulation claims and so your debate technique is outed as gamesmanship, not an earnest exchange of sometimes contradictory data.

87 posted on 06/29/2022 2:43:32 PM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

You’re wrong. I’ll take the opinions of attorneys that I know and trust. You go ahead and continue to wear kneepads and/or grab ankles for Fauci and c.


88 posted on 06/29/2022 10:58:38 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Cv19 vaccines are Phase 2 of the CCP bioweapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt

SecAmndmt wrote: “You’re wrong. I’ll take the opinions of attorneys that I know and trust. You go ahead and continue to wear kneepads and/or grab ankles for Fauci and c.”

Please cite the opinions of attorneys.


89 posted on 06/30/2022 4:56:37 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

This article contains the opinions of the attorneys at Children’s Health Defense. Did you even read it? Or are you blowing smoke again?


90 posted on 07/02/2022 12:05:19 AM PDT by SecAmndmt (Cv19 vaccines are Phase 2 of the CCP bioweapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt

SecAmndmt wrote: “This article contains the opinions of the attorneys at Children’s Health Defense. Did you even read it? Or are you blowing smoke again?”

Children’s Health Defense is the mouth piece for RFK Jr. whose opinions on vaccines have consistently been proven wrong.

BTW, the link takes one to Natural Health 365 which has been warned by the Federal Trade Commission that it is making illegal claims. The FTC: “... determined that you are
unlawfully advertising that certain products treat or prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID19).”

https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/warning-letters/covid-19-letter_to_natural_health_365.pdf

IOW, your article is nothing more than a recital of the spurious charges made by the anti-vaxxer conspiracy cult to convince people to purchase unproven homeopathic remedies rather than become vaccinated. It is nothing more than the exploitation of the naive and gullible.


91 posted on 07/02/2022 5:41:32 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson