[butlerweave]

Does this judge watch the news ?

[T.B. Yoits]

So... the Louisiana Judiciary is going to claim rights that the Supreme Court found belongs in the Legislature?

[NorthMountain]

Jus’ gotta keep killin’ babies. Molech is hungry ...

[Signalman]

Why is there a United States Supreme Court if any two-bit judge can violate their ruling?

[Hammerhead]

Its a State issue.

Let them slug it out.

[Jeff Chandler]

[READINABLUESTATE]

Supremacy over the supreme court, it’s the democrat way.

[butlerweave]

so judges are going to takeover and make them keep abortion ?

[pfflier]

which for nearly 50 years had granted women the constitutional right to an abortion.

The big lie perpetuates itself through false reporting.

[Halls]

That judge can’t do that! Her ruling should be ignored by the State.

[KC Burke]

The state legislature passed the law. They can IMPEACH this week, hold trial next week and remove her from the bench after conviction. Only the. Will the rule of law return.

[SmokingJoe]

The key word here being “temporary”. This little judge's far left tantrum will not get anywhere.
Pretty much standard for the left to throw a hissy fit.

[guardian_of_liberty]

Let the Legislature impeach. Simple.

[SecondAmendment]

This is WAY bigger than abortion, ultimately it is about the government determining who lives and who dies.

The Dems will have no choice but to start a second civil war over this if they want to continue transitioning us to a global feudalistic government.

[usconservative]

“Louisiana’s court made the right call today to swiftly block this unjust ban from taking effect," according to statement by Jenny Ma

Unjust for who? The unborn child, that's who!

[lurk]

This becomes an issue between the judge and the legislature.

[POWG]

It’s a state court and a state law. I expect an avalanche of similar rulings. They will all end up in the Supreme Court of each state. There will probably also be a bunch of state constitutional amendments put on the ballot.

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

Unconstitutinal. The 10th amendment clearly states...

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."

[frank ballenger]

the constitutional right to an abortion.

NO.

as in NO.

There is no such "right" for this warped legislation from the bench, only a privilege to get votes.

Facilitated the murder of millions of preborn babies for years.

[DoughtyOne]

I don’t see a valid reason for a temporary hold.

States now have the right to block abortions, and this state
was not out of line with its actions.

The judge was.

I love how they interview people who want the ability to kill
the unborn, and not a single interview with someone defending
the unborn. (unless I missed it)