Jumper wrote:
“
This decision says nothing about birthing persons, so it further gives legal basis for what a woman and by extension the definition of what man is.
“
DoodleDawg wrote:
“
Can challenges to Obergfell be far behind? I doubt that many people will want 50 years of gay marriage to go by.
“
Maybe ‘gay marriage ‘ is next to be struck down, using Jumper’s reasoning.
I read the decision in its entirety and found no reference of who other than in the womb gets an abortion.
The Court sold out the English language and was carefully aware not to mention women or men or Trans people.
How could the Court craft killing Roe without mentioning women is a sign that they have not treaded up the madness of woke sexuality.