Beat me to it.
Exactly right. No client, present or potential, can trust this law firm to fairly represent them. They obviously are willing to consider the wishes of clients other than those who have actions in progress at any given time.
The most telling point is one by a commentator who wrote that K & E took on the case and no doubt charged a substantial fee for the representation. An attorney of Clement’s stature does not come cheaply. When an attorney takes on a client, the principled ones will assure that client that while no outcome can be promised, the attorney will be a vigorous and effective advocate. In this case, Clement and Murphy not only delivered on such a promise but won the case. It seems to me K & E forgot those commitments but probably did not forget how to bill.