Big brain on SCOTUS Sodapop.
YAY‼️
She really is not worthy of being on the Court.
Perhaps the most unqualified, and stupid, person to ever sit on the Supreme Court.
I can hear her now directing her clerks: “Come up with some reasons I don’t like it and use big words to make me sound smart!”
Based on what evidence, exactly?
So I take it her position that ID requirements in airports are also racist?
(which requires a photo ID to vote)
Oh my!!!! How restrictive!!!!
😀
Meanwhile in NC we voted for voter ID 3 years ago and the courts are still holding it up on a transparently BS claim that either the legislature wrote the law or the voters voted for the law with discriminatory intent. The basis of evidence for this claim is nothing more than “cuz we think so”. There is ZERO evidence that anybody is unable to obtain state ID. The law even provides for those who can’t spare the $10 it costs to get one to be able to apply and get one for free.
Gosh, why would the Democrats so bitterly oppose somebody showing up to vote showing government issued photo ID so that those not valid to vote can be prevented from doing so? I just can’t figure out why the Democrats would want less secure elections. Its a complete mystery......
Low IQ people take note.
Gorsuch
Barret
Kavanaugh
Are in SCOTUS because RINO’s voted approval for them.
Democrats did not.
***Affirmative Action Leftist Institution Destroying Political Pick Alert***
These decisions will soon be 7-2 and religious liberty cases will be 6-3 instead of 7-2 after Breyer leaves the Court.
No doubt an intelligent and legally profound dissent grounded in solid jurisprudence precedent.
And next year she won’t be their most extreme leftist.
And nothing but a Partisan, Affirmative Action hack..
Does this mean Beyer (or his replacement Jackson) was one of the 8?
Drat, how will Democrats vote in five counties and three
different states on the same day from now on?
This has got to be unConstitutional.
/s
Only saving grace about this activist fool is she’s a type 1 diabetic, so her time on the bench will likely be brief.
This is a bigger ruling than many realize. GOP has done well in building reasonably conservative majorities in many states and many of them have been passing laws to fight the rat election cheats. But the left, often behind Soros bucks, has done well winning AG and SoS positions responsible for enforcing those laws. Their response is to first, not bother to enforce laws they don’t like. And second not to defend them in court when some of their numerous lefty ‘public interest’ law firms conjure ridiculous suits to overturn them. The left wins by default. The people’s representatives, who’d passed the laws, and whom constitutionally are supposed to be sovereign regarding election law are denied standing and left powerless before King Soros’s delegates. This means that a legislature good enough to pass election law reforms has at least a chance to defend them in court. How they fare in advocating their position once in court probably needs additional SCOTUS help. My understanding is SCOTUS is considering taking up a case next session which could accomplish that. That they got 8 votes from this court so might get 7 from the next court should encourage judges on the right from taking that case.