What part of your recounting actually says that the criminal who took the ‘open-carry’ man’s rifle WITH AN “OPEN-CARRY” rifle? All your sentences after the first one are as meaningless as the first.
“What part of your recounting actually says that the criminal who took the ‘open-carry’ man’s rifle WITH AN “OPEN-CARRY” rifle?”
None.
“What part of your recounting actually says that the criminal who took the ‘open-carry’ man’s rifle WITH AN “OPEN-CARRY” rifle? “
How many innocents did the “open-carry man” shoot?
I guess you have no problem with attempted murder and innocents getting shot.