Posted on 06/04/2022 11:11:40 AM PDT by RandFan
@RepThomasMassie
Rep. Massie and @TuckerCarlson destroy Chairman Nadler's argument to ban sale of firearms to those under 21.
Clip... [1 min 40 sec]
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
If they raise the gun-buying age to 21, they need to raise the draft age to that too, otherwise it’s really retarded. Basically the same as the old “can get drafted to die in Vietnam at 18, but can’t vote until 21” thing that led to the passage of the Twenty-sixth Amendment.
Love it!
There’s more. Lower the drinking age to 18. It’s only right constitutionally speaking. Everyone ignores it anyway except the drinking establishments.
Perhaps we should raise the age of adulthood to 20. The MSM won’t be able to refer to 18 year-old troublemakers as ‘teenagers’. As I see it 18 and 19 year olds can be referred to as whatever ones narrative is and the MSM is big time guilty. With 20 years of age being the adult threshold the only adult 18/19 year-old adults out there can be members of the armed forces.
Try telling that to the public and see what happens. Package it with school on Saturdays-a sex break for parents.
The most amazing thing is that Nadler openly admitted it— they need to draft people before their brains mature. By 21 many would be mature enough to think for themselves about what they are being drafted for, and rebellion would follow.
Ahem; what age can you buy a cigarette?
Dims knew long term the young vote liberal.
In Florida it’s 21 as of last year. Here in our area, Walmarts are no longer stocking cigarettes and when they are all gone....no more cigs.
Once again we see progs demonstrating they can not think past first base no matter what age they are.
.
5/26/22
LOS ANGELES (CBS SF/AP) — The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Wednesday that California’s ban on the sale of semiautomatic weapons to adults under 21 is unconstitutional.
In a 2-1 ruling, a panel of the San Francisco-based court said on Wednesday the law violates the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms and a San Diego judge should have blocked what it called “an almost total ban on semiautomatic centerfire rifles” for young adults. “America would not exist without the heroism of the young adults who fought and died in our revolutionary army,” Judge Ryan Nelson wrote.
“Today we reaffirm that our Constitution still protects the right that enabled their sacrifice: the right of young adults to keep and bear arms.”
What’s the diff between this ruling and what they’re talking about?
raise the voting age back to 21
Repealing the 26th Amendment isn’t realistic.
21 in Hawaii. Other States too, I believe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.