I’m not the only one to contemplate this being a plus for
Durham.
If you wanted to move a Clinton trial out of Washington,
D. C., what better way to support it than by having a
jury ignore compelling evidence to come up with a not
guilty verdict in a trial concerning the whole matter?
(not claiming this article makes that point)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4067515/posts
Impossible to win a case when the D.C. jury was not only all democrats but anti-FBI democrats as well.
Remember, Hillary was furious at Comey for airing out her dirty email-hard drive laundry while at the same time deciding not to prosecute.
I am thinking that the Sussman jury felt a great deal of satisfaction in acquitting a Hillary hack who “duped” the hated FBI.
And wouldn’t you know it, but the admission that the Perkins Coie law firm had an office in the FBI building and that office was run by Sussman came out right after the trial verdict. When the fish rots; it rots from the head.