This may be the problem:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-features/suzanne-scott-fox-news-25th-anniversary-1235025880/
To be sure, Scott has elevated a cadre of women, who now make up more than half of Fox News Media’s senior leadership. “She’s done an incredible job of reimagining this company,” says Sharri Berg, president of Fox Weather. “We have so many female leaders and female managers. It’s not just one or two people. In the old days, we had all of these silos. She has broken down those walls. It’s really a different company.”
These gals are great to look at but some say it's a bit too much of the same thing?
It would be nice to have real diversity Sunday Mornings - diversity of thought...
Since ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC ask the questions their liberal viewers want to hear, it would seem Fox could do the same for their viewers.
If FOX felt attractiveness was key - and in an effort to appeal to conservative women - hired young men between the ages of 26 and 36 (total ‘hunks’) it’d be fine. But we’d at least like them to be conservative.
I feel the same about their women anchors. If blond attractive women is a minimum requirement - then choose someone like Dana Perino. She doesn’t represent MAGA conservatives, but she can ask her own questions and she’s conservative. Better - if ‘young blond’ isn’t a requirement Tammy Bruce is conservative and smart.
If ‘woman’ isn’t a requirement than go with Jesse Watters or Stephen Miller. My problem with Chris Wallace wasn’t that he his facelift was cheap - or his age - but that he looked down on conservatives and didn’t take the time to understand our positions.